Sonographic evaluation in the second stage of labor to improve the assessment of labor progress and its outcome
- PMID: 19247999
- PMCID: PMC3138397
- DOI: 10.1002/uog.6336
Sonographic evaluation in the second stage of labor to improve the assessment of labor progress and its outcome
Figures






Comment in
-
What is the best transperineal ultrasound parameter for predicting success of vacuum extraction?Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jun;33(6):735; author reply 736. doi: 10.1002/uog.6400. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19434619 No abstract available.
References
-
- Dietz HP, Lanzarone V, Simpson JM. Predicting operative delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;27:409–15. - PubMed
-
- Calkins LA. On predicting the length of labor: I. First stage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1941;42:802–11.
-
- Calkins LA. Second stage of labor: The descent phase. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1944;48:798–803.
-
- Friedman EA. The graphic analysis of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1954;68:1568–75. - PubMed
-
- Friedman EA. Cervimetry: an objective method for the study of cervical dilatation in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1956;71:1189–93. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources