Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Mar 15;61(3):370-7.
doi: 10.1002/art.24356.

A quality indicator set for systemic lupus erythematosus

Jinoos Yazdany  1 , Pantelis Panopalis, Joann Zell Gillis, Gabriela Schmajuk, Catherine H MacLean, David Wofsy, Edward Yelin; Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Quality Indicators Project Expert Panels
Collaborators, Affiliations

A quality indicator set for systemic lupus erythematosus

Jinoos Yazdany et al. Arthritis Rheum. .

Abstract

Objective: To systematically develop a quality indicator (QI) set for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods: We used a validated process that combined available scientific evidence and expert consensus to develop a QI set for SLE. We extracted 20 candidate indicators from a systematic literature review of clinical practice guidelines pertaining to SLE. An advisory panel revised and augmented these candidate indicators and, through 2 rounds of voting, arrived at 25 QIs. These QIs advanced to the next phase of the project, in which we employed a modification of the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. A systematic review of the literature was performed for each QI, linking the proposed process of care to potential improved health outcomes. After reviewing this scientific evidence, a second interdisciplinary expert panel convened to discuss the evidence and provide final ratings on the validity and feasibility of each QI.

Results: The final expert panel rated 20 QIs as both valid and feasible. Areas covered included diagnosis, general preventive strategies (e.g., vaccinations, sun avoidance counseling, and screening for cardiovascular disease), osteoporosis prevention and treatment, drug toxicity monitoring, renal disease, and reproductive health.

Conclusion: We employed a rigorous multistep approach with systematic literature reviews and 2 expert panels to develop QIs for SLE. This new set of indicators provides an opportunity to assess health care quality in patients with SLE and represents an initial step toward the important goal of improving care in this patient population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Methods for Developing the SLE Quality Indicator Set
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Sutcliffe N, Clarke AE, Gordon C, Farewell V, Isenberg DA. The association of socio-economic status, race, psychosocial factors and outcome in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford, England) 1999;38(11):1130–7. - PubMed
    1. Ward MM, Lotstein DS, Bush TM, Lambert RE, van Vollenhoven R, Neuwelt CM. Psychosocial correlates of morbidity in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. The Journal of rheumatology. 1999;26(10):2153–8. - PubMed
    1. Karlson EW, Daltroy LH, Lew RA, et al. The relationship of socioeconomic status, race, and modifiable risk factors to outcomes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis and rheumatism. 1997;40(1):47–56. - PubMed
    1. Friedman AW, Alarcon GS, McGwin G, Jr, et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus in three ethnic groups. IV. Factors associated with self-reported functional outcome in a large cohort study. LUMINA Study Group. Lupus in Minority Populations, Nature versus Nurture. Arthritis Care Res. 1999;12(4):256–66. - PubMed
    1. Bernatsky S, Pineau C, Joseph L, Clarke A. Adherence to ophthalmologic monitoring for antimalarial toxicity in a lupus cohort. The Journal of rheumatology. 2003;30(8):1756–60. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances