Prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (TRITON-TIMI 38): double-blind, randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 19249633
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60441-4
Prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (TRITON-TIMI 38): double-blind, randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Mechanical reperfusion with stenting for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is supported by dual antiplatelet treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel. Prasugrel, a potent and rapid-acting thienopyridine, is a potential alternative to clopidogrel. We aimed to assess prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI.
Methods: We undertook a double-blind, randomised controlled trial in 707 sites in 30 countries. 3534 participants presenting with STEMI were randomly assigned by interactive voice response system either prasugrel (60 mg loading, 10 mg maintenance [n=1769]) or clopidogrel (300 mg loading, 75 mg maintenance [n=1765]) and were unaware of the allocation. The primary endpoint was cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke. Efficacy analyses were by intention to treat. Follow-up was to 15 months, with secondary analyses at 30 days. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00097591.
Findings: At 30 days, 115 (6.5%) individuals assigned prasugrel had met the primary endpoint compared with 166 (9.5%) allocated clopidogrel (hazard ratio 0.68 [95% CI 0.54-0.87]; p=0.0017). This effect continued to 15 months (174 [10.0%] vs 216 [12.4%]; 0.79 [0.65-0.97]; p=0.0221). The key secondary endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or urgent target vessel revascularisation was also significantly reduced with prasugrel at 30 days (0.75 [0.59-0.96]; p=0.0205) and 15 months (0.79 [0.65-0.97]; p=0.0250), as was stent thrombosis. Treatments did not differ with respect to thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major bleeding unrelated to coronary-artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery at 30 days (p=0.3359) and 15 months (p=0.6451). TIMI life-threatening bleeding and TIMI major or minor bleeding were also similar with the two treatments, and only TIMI major bleeding after CABG surgery was significantly increased with prasugrel (p=0.0033).
Interpretation: In patients with STEMI undergoing PCI, prasugrel is more effective than clopidogrel for prevention of ischaemic events, without an apparent excess in bleeding.
Comment in
-
Ischaemia versus bleeding: the art of clinical decision-making.Lancet. 2009 Feb 28;373(9665):695-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60413-X. Lancet. 2009. PMID: 19249613 No abstract available.
-
Prasugrel STEMI subgroup analysis.Lancet. 2009 May 30;373(9678):1845-6; author reply 1846-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61019-9. Lancet. 2009. PMID: 19482209 No abstract available.
-
Prasugrel STEMI subgroup analysis.Lancet. 2009 May 30;373(9678):1846; author reply 1846-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61020-5. Lancet. 2009. PMID: 19482210 No abstract available.
-
Prasugrel STEMI subgroup analysis.Lancet. 2009 May 30;373(9678):1846; author reply 1846-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61021-7. Lancet. 2009. PMID: 19482212 No abstract available.
-
ACP Journal Club. Prasugrel prevented ischemic events compared with clopidogrel in patients having PCI for STEMI.Ann Intern Med. 2009 Jun 16;150(12):JC6-10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-12-200906160-02010. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19528555 No abstract available.
-
Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in primary PCI: considerations of the TRITON-TIMI 38 substudy.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2009 Sep;11(5):323-4. doi: 10.1007/s11886-009-0056-2. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2009. PMID: 19709491 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
