Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Mar;37(2):85-93.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.04.257.

Adverse outcomes associated with Contact Precautions: a review of the literature

Affiliations
Review

Adverse outcomes associated with Contact Precautions: a review of the literature

Daniel J Morgan et al. Am J Infect Control. 2009 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Contact Precautions (CP) are a standard method for preventing patient-to-patient transmission of multiple drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in hospital settings. With the ongoing worldwide concern for MDROs including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and broadened use of active surveillance programs, an increasing number of patients are being placed on CP. Whereas few would argue that CP are an important tool in infection control, many reports and small studies have observed worse noninfectious outcomes in patients on CP. However, no review of this literature exists.

Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature describing adverse outcomes associated with CP. We identified 15 studies published between 1989 and 2008 relating to adverse outcomes from CP. Nine were higher quality based on standardized collection of data and/or inclusion of control groups.

Results: Four main adverse outcomes related to CP were identified in this review. These included less patient-health care worker contact, changes in systems of care that produce delays and more noninfectious adverse events, increased symptoms of depression and anxiety, and decreased patient satisfaction with care.

Conclusion: Although CP are recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as an intervention to control spread of MDROs, our review of the literature demonstrates that this approach has unintended consequences that are potentially deleterious to the patient. Measures to ameliorate these deleterious consequences of CP are urgently needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest to report.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. van den Broek PJ. Historical perspectives for the new millennium. In: Wenzel RP, editor. Chapter I. Prevention and control of nosocomial infections. 4. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2003. pp. 3–14.
    1. Snider GL. Tuberculosis then and now: a personal perspective on the last 50 years. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:237–43. - PubMed
    1. Garner JS, Simmons BP. Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. Infect Control. 1983;4:245–325. - PubMed
    1. Fine L, Wachspress M, Grauber DN. Psychological adaptation of patients during treatment of acute leukaemia in life island isolator. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1969;3:27–34.
    1. Garner JS and the Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. Am J Infect Control. 1996;24:24–52. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms