Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Mar:32 Suppl 1:S94-7.
doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.02262.x.

Timing of the left ventricular electrogram and acute hemodynamic changes during implant of cardiac resynchronization therapy devices

Affiliations

Timing of the left ventricular electrogram and acute hemodynamic changes during implant of cardiac resynchronization therapy devices

Berry M van Gelder et al. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Mar.

Abstract

Study objective: To examine the relationship between timing of the left ventricular (LV) electrogram (EGM) and its acute hemodynamic effect on instantaneous change in LV pressure (LVdP/dt(MAX)).

Patients and methods: In 30 patients (mean = age 67 +/- 7.9 years) who underwent implant of cardiac resynchronization therapy systems, the right ventricular (RV) lead was implanted at the RV apex (n = 23) or RV septum (n = 7). The LV lead was placed in a posterior (n = 14) or posterolateral (n = 16) coronary sinus tributary. QRS duration, interval from Q wave to intrinsic deflection of the LV EGM (Q-LV), and interval between intrinsic deflection of RV EGM and LV EGM (RV-LV interval) were measured. The measurements were correlated with the hemodynamic effects of optimized biventricular (BiV) stimulation, using the Pearson correlation coefficient.

Results: The mean LVdP/dt(MAX) at baseline was 734 +/- 180 mmHg/s, and increased to 905 +/- 165 mmHg/s during simultaneous BiV pacing, and to 933 +/- 172 mmHg/s after V-V interval optimization. The Pearson correlation coefficient R between QRS duration, the Q-LV interval, and the RV-LV interval at the respective LVdP/dt(MAX) was 0.291 (P = 0.66), 0.348 (P = 0.030), and 0.340 (P = 0.033).

Conclusions: Similar significant correlations were observed between the acute hemodynamic effect of optimized BiV stimulation and the Q-LV and the RV-LV intervals. However, individual measurements showed an 80-ms cut-off for the Q-LV interval, beyond which the increase in LVdP/dt(MAX) was <10%.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources