Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Mar;12(1):27-37.
doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00515.x.

Colorectal cancer patients' attitudes towards involvement in decision making

Affiliations

Colorectal cancer patients' attitudes towards involvement in decision making

Kinta Beaver et al. Health Expect. 2009 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: To design and administer an attitude rating scale, exploring colorectal cancer patients' views of involvement in decision making. To examine the impact of socio-demographic and/or treatment-related factors on decision making. To conduct principal components analysis to determine if the scale could be simplified into a number of factors for future clinical utility.

Methods: An attitude rating scale was constructed based on previous qualitative work and administered to colorectal cancer patients using a cross-sectional survey approach.

Results: 375 questionnaires were returned (81.7% response). For patients it was important to be informed and involved in the decision-making process. Information was not always used to make decisions as patients placed their trust in medical expertise. Women had more positive opinions on decision making and were more likely to want to make decisions. Written information was understood to a greater degree than verbal information. The scale could be simplified to a number of factors, indicating clinical utility.

Conclusion: Few studies have explored the attitudes of colorectal cancer patients towards involvement in decision making. This study presents new insights into how patients view the concept of participation; important when considering current policy imperatives in the UK of involving service users in all aspects of care and treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Department of Health . NHS Cancer Plan. London: Department of Health, 2000.
    1. Beaver K, Bogg J, Luker K. Decision‐making role preferences and information needs: a comparison of colorectal and breast cancer. Health Expectations, 1999; 2: 266–276. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Degner LF, Kristjanson LJ, Bowman D et al. Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1997; 277: 1485–1492. - PubMed
    1. Beaver K, Luker KA, Owens RG, Leinster SJ, Degner LF, Sloan JA. Treatment decision‐making in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Cancer Nursing, 1996; 19: 8–19. - PubMed
    1. Davidson BJ, Degner LF, Morgan TR. Information and decision‐making preferences of men with prostate cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 1995; 22: 1401–1408. - PubMed

Publication types