Midazolam with meperidine or fentanyl for colonoscopy: results of a randomized trial
- PMID: 19251010
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.033
Midazolam with meperidine or fentanyl for colonoscopy: results of a randomized trial
Abstract
Background: A combination of midazolam and opioid is usually used to achieve sedation and analgesia during colonoscopy. Two commonly used opioids are meperidine and fentanyl, but few studies have compared their efficacy.
Objective: This randomized trial aimed to compare the efficacy and recovery time of 2 sedation regimens consisting of midazolam in combination with either meperidine or fentanyl.
Design, setting, and patients: A total of 300 consecutive, unselected adults attending outpatient colonoscopy at a District General Hospital were enrolled with informed consent and randomized to receive midazolam with meperidine or fentanyl. Data for procedure times, perceived discomfort (according to standard 100-mm visual analog scales [VAS]), and recovery time were collected. Patients and all endoscopy staff directly involved with the procedure were blinded to the regimen used.
Main outcome measurements: Primary: patients' experience of pain (postrecovery VAS score); secondary: recovery time.
Results: A total of 287 patients (150 female, mean [SD] age 54 [17] years) were studied. Recovery time (in minutes) was significantly shorter in patients receiving fentanyl (n = 138) than in those receiving meperidine (n = 149, mean +/- SE: 13.7 +/- 1.8 vs 18.7 +/- 1.7, P = .03), whereas there was no difference in the patients', endoscopists', or nurses' perception of pain during the procedure between the 2 groups. Both groups received a median dose of 3 mg of midazolam (range 2-5 mg). In patients receiving lower doses (2-2.5 and 3-3.5 mg), recovery times were significantly faster with fentanyl (P < .01 and <.05, respectively), whereas at higher doses of midazolam (> or =4 mg) there was no difference between the 2 groups.
Limitations: The use of VAS scores and nurse assessment of recovery time were chosen in this study because, despite their subjectivity, these measures were felt to most closely reflect true clinical practice.
Conclusions: The use of fentanyl in combination with low-dose midazolam results in significantly faster recovery from sedation compared with meperidine, without any apparent loss of analgesic effect.
Similar articles
-
Clinical trial: a randomized, study comparing meperidine (pethidine) and fentanyl in adult gastrointestinal endoscopy.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Apr 15;29(8):817-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.03943.x. Epub 2009 Jan 20. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009. PMID: 19154568 Clinical Trial.
-
Sedation for colonoscopy using a single bolus is safe, effective, and efficient: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Sep;95(9):2242-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02308.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000. PMID: 11007224 Clinical Trial.
-
Early cognitive impairment after sedation for colonoscopy: the effect of adding midazolam and/or fentanyl to propofol.Anesth Analg. 2009 Nov;109(5):1448-55. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a6ad31. Epub 2009 Jul 17. Anesth Analg. 2009. PMID: 19617584 Clinical Trial.
-
Analgesia and sedation during mechanical ventilation in neonates.Clin Ther. 2005 Jun;27(6):877-99. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.06.019. Clin Ther. 2005. PMID: 16117990 Review.
-
Preparation, premedication, and surveillance.Endoscopy. 2004 Jan;36(1):23-31. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-814117. Endoscopy. 2004. PMID: 14722852 Review.
Cited by
-
Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: current issues.World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 28;19(4):463-81. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i4.463. World J Gastroenterol. 2013. PMID: 23382625 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sedation reversal trends at outpatient ambulatory endoscopic center vs in-hospital ambulatory procedure center using a triage protocol.World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Jul 16;16(7):413-423. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i7.413. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2024. PMID: 39072249 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of carbamazepine or phenytoin therapy on blood level of intravenously administered midazolam: a prospective cohort study.J Anesth. 2016 Feb;30(1):166-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-015-2063-3. Epub 2015 Aug 14. J Anesth. 2016. PMID: 26272251
-
The impact of advances in instrumentation and techniques of colonoscopy from 1988 to 2008 on inpatient colonoscopy performance at a high volume endoscopy unit in the United States: significantly shorter procedure time, higher completion rate, performance on sicker inpatients, and near disappearance of flexible sigmoidoscopy.Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Dec;55(12):3521-9. doi: 10.1007/s10620-010-1207-4. Epub 2010 Apr 17. Dig Dis Sci. 2010. PMID: 20401535
-
Operational outcomes of propofol sedation versus fentanyl, midazolam and diphenhydramine sedation for endoscopies and colonoscopies at an academic medical center.PLoS One. 2023 Nov 27;18(11):e0294418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294418. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 38011117 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical