Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Apr;52(2):359-72.
doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/07-0012). Epub 2009 Feb 27.

Inferencing processes after right hemisphere brain damage: maintenance of inferences

Margaret Lehman Blake  1
Affiliations

Inferencing processes after right hemisphere brain damage: maintenance of inferences

Margaret Lehman Blake. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: This study was designed to replicate and extend a previous study of inferencing in which some adults with right hemisphere damage (RHD) generated but did not maintain predictive inferences over time (M. Lehman-Blake & C. Tompkins, 2001). Two hypotheses were tested: (a) inferences were deactivated, and (b) selection of previously generated inferences was slowed and not measurable with the original stimuli. Existing literature did not support one hypothesis over the other.

Method: Fourteen adults with RHD and 14 with no brain damage (NBD) participated in this mixed-design study. Participants read short narratives that suggested a predictive inference. Reading times were obtained to assess inference generation, maintenance, and integration.

Results: The majority of participants evidenced generation and maintenance of inferences. For the few who did not maintain inferences, participants with NBD always deactivated the inferences, whereas those with RHD demonstrated either deactivation or slowed selection. Adults with RHD were more likely to exhibit slowing in inference generation and integration.

Conclusions: The results for inference maintenance differ from the original study in that most participants with RHD maintained inferences. Deactivation appeared in both groups, whereas slowed selection appeared to be an aberrant process related to RHD. Future work is needed to tease out the relationships between comprehension, working memory, and inferencing processes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Individual data indicating generation of predictive inferences by participants in two groups. NBD = no brain damage; RHD = right hemisphere damage.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Individual data depicting maintenance of predictive inferences by participants in two groups.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Albrecht JE, O’Brien EJ. Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1993;19:1061–1070.
    1. Allbritton D. Strategic production of predictive inferences during comprehension. Discourse Processes. 2004;38:309–322.
    1. American National Standards Institute. ANSI S3.6-2004. New York: Author; 1996. Specification for audiometers.
    1. Annet M. A classification of hand preference by association analysis. British Journal of Psychology. 1970;61:303–321. - PubMed
    1. Beeman M. Semantic processing in the right hemisphere may contribute to drawing inferences from discourse. Brain and Language. 1993;44:80–120. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources