There is no magic fruit fly trap: multiple biological factors influence the response of adult Anastrepha ludens and Anastrepha obliqua (Diptera: Tephritidae) individuals to MultiLure traps baited with BioLure or NuLure
- PMID: 19253622
- DOI: 10.1603/029.102.0113
There is no magic fruit fly trap: multiple biological factors influence the response of adult Anastrepha ludens and Anastrepha obliqua (Diptera: Tephritidae) individuals to MultiLure traps baited with BioLure or NuLure
Abstract
Field-cage experiments were performed to determine the effectiveness of MultiLure traps (Better World MFG Inc., Fresno, CA) baited with NuLure (Miller Chemical and Fertilizer Corp., Hanover, PA) or BioLure (Suterra LLC, Inc., Bend, OR) in capturing individually marked Mexican fruit fly, Anastrepha ludens (Loew), and West Indian fruit fly, Anastrepha obliqua (Macquart) (Diptera: Tephritidae), of both sexes. Experimental treatments involved wild and laboratory-reared flies of varying ages (2-4 and 15-18 d) and dietary histories (sugar only, open fruit, open fruit plus chicken feces, and hydrolyzed protein mixed with sugar). Data were divided into two parts: total captures over a 24-h period and trap visits/landings, entrances into interior of trap ,and effective captures (i.e., drowning in liquid bait or water) over a 5-h detailed observation period (0600-1100 hours). The response to the two baits varied by fly species, gender, physiological state, age, and strain. Importantly, there were several highly significant interactions among these factors, underlining the complex nature of the response. The two baits differed in attractiveness for A. obliqua but not A. ludens. The effect of strain (wild versus laboratory flies) was significant for A. ludens but not A. obliqua. For effect of dietary history, adults of both species, irrespective of sex, were significantly less responsive to both baits when fed on a mixture of protein and sugar when compared with adults fed the other diets. Finally, we confirmed previous observations indicating that McPhail-type traps are quite inefficient. Considering the total 24-h fly tenure in the cage, and independent of bait treatment and fly type (i.e., strain, adult diet, gender and age), of a total of 2,880 A. obliqua and 2,880 A. ludens adults released into the field cages over the entire study (15 replicates), only 564 (19.6%) and 174 (6%) individuals, respectively, were effectively caught. When only considering the 5-h detailed observation period and independent of bait treatment and fly type, of a total of 785 marked flies that landed on traps (519 females and 266 males, respectively), only 10.3% (144 females and 59 males) and 20.8% (25 females and 18 males) A. obliqua and A. ludens individuals, respectively, ended up being effectively captured. We discuss the practical implications of these findings with respect to developing new baits and designing new traps and to the interpretation of capture results in the field.
Similar articles
-
Effect of multiple endogenous biological factors on the response of the tephritids Anastrepha ludens and Anastrepha obliqua (Diptera: Tephritidae) to multilure traps baited with BioLure or NuLure in mango orchards.J Econ Entomol. 2014 Jun;107(3):1022-31. doi: 10.1603/ec13194. J Econ Entomol. 2014. PMID: 25026661
-
Comparative Responses of Anastrepha ludens and Anastrepha obliqua (Diptera: Tephritidae) to the Synthetic Attractant BioLure.J Econ Entomol. 2016 Oct;109(5):2054-2060. doi: 10.1093/jee/tow169. Epub 2016 Jul 29. J Econ Entomol. 2016. PMID: 27473263
-
Comparison of two synthetic food-odor lures for captures of feral Mexican fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Mexico and implications regarding use of irradiated flies to assess lure efficacy.J Econ Entomol. 2007 Aug;100(4):1147-52. doi: 10.1603/0022-0493(2007)100[1147:cotsfl]2.0.co;2. J Econ Entomol. 2007. PMID: 17849863
-
Host marking pheromone (HMP) in the Mexican fruit fly Anastrepha ludens.Chimia (Aarau). 2010;64(1-2):37-42. doi: 10.2533/chimia.2010.37. Chimia (Aarau). 2010. PMID: 21137682 Review.
-
Superparasitism in the Fruit Fly Parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and the Implications for Mass Rearing and Augmentative Release.Insects. 2012 Sep 25;3(4):900-11. doi: 10.3390/insects3040900. Insects. 2012. PMID: 26466718 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
From trickle to flood: the large-scale, cryptic invasion of California by tropical fruit flies.Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Aug 7;280(1768):20131466. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.1466. Print 2013 Oct 7. Proc Biol Sci. 2013. PMID: 23926154 Free PMC article.
-
Population Dynamics of Anastrepha ludens (Loew) (Diptera: Tephritidae) on Citrus Areas in Southern Tamaulipas, Mexico.Neotrop Entomol. 2015 Dec;44(6):565-73. doi: 10.1007/s13744-015-0328-z. Epub 2015 Sep 14. Neotrop Entomol. 2015. PMID: 26371365
-
A First Glimpse of the Mexican Fruit Fly Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae) Antenna Morphology and Proteome in Response to a Proteinaceous Attractant.Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Oct 29;21(21):8086. doi: 10.3390/ijms21218086. Int J Mol Sci. 2020. PMID: 33138264 Free PMC article.
-
Electroantennographic Responses of Wild and Laboratory-Reared Females of Xyleborus affinis Eichhoff and Xyleborus ferrugineus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) to Ethanol and Bark Volatiles of Three Host-Plant Species.Insects. 2022 Jul 21;13(7):655. doi: 10.3390/insects13070655. Insects. 2022. PMID: 35886831 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Physiological Status and Environmental Factors on the Lure Responses of Three Pest Fruit Fly Species (Diptera: Tephritidae).J Chem Ecol. 2024 Nov;50(11):679-700. doi: 10.1007/s10886-024-01516-8. Epub 2024 Jul 8. J Chem Ecol. 2024. PMID: 38976098 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources