Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Mar 2:9:14.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-14.

Recruitment barriers in a randomized controlled trial from the physicians' perspective: a postal survey

Affiliations

Recruitment barriers in a randomized controlled trial from the physicians' perspective: a postal survey

Anne Spaar et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. .

Abstract

Background: The feasibility of randomized trials often depends on successful patient recruitment. Although numerous recruitment barriers have been identified it is unclear which of them complicate recruitment most. Also, most surveys have focused on the patients' perspective of recruitment barriers whereas the perspective of recruiting physicians has received less attention. Therefore, our aim was to conduct a postal survey among recruiting physicians of a multi-center trial to weigh barriers according to their impact on recruitment.

Methods: We identified any potential recruitment barriers from the literature and from our own experience with a multi-center trial of respiratory rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We developed and pilot-tested a self-administered questionnaire where recruiting physicians were asked to express their agreement with statements about recruitment barriers on a Likert-type scale from 1 (full agreement with statement = very substantial recruitment barrier) to 7 (no agreement with statement = no recruitment barrier).

Results: 38 of 55 recruiting physicians returned questionnaires (69% response rate), of which 35 could be analyzed (64% useable response rate). Recruiting physicians reported that "time constraints" (median agreement of 3, interquartile range 2-5) had the most negative impact on recruitment followed by "difficulties including identified eligible patients" (median agreement of 5, IQR 3-6). Other barriers such as "trial design barriers", "lack of access to treatment", "individual barriers of recruiting physicians" or "insufficient training of recruiting physicians" were perceived to have little or no impact on patient recruitment.

Conclusion: Physicians perceived time constraints as the most relevant recruitment barrier in a randomized trial. To overcome recruitment barriers interventions, that are affordable for both industry- and investigator-driven trials, need to be developed and tested in randomized trials.

Trial registration: ISRCTN84612310.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Question categories.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Results of all 35 questionnaire items. Statements about potential recruitment barriers were assigned to 7 categories. Physicians were asked to express their agreement with these statements on a Likert-type scale from 1 to 7. Box plots with medians and interquartile ranges summarize the answers of the physicians. For each category a summary plot of the answers is presented. Because of limited space some of the questions are slightly shortened. For the original question, please see the appended questionnaire.

References

    1. Ellis PM. Attitudes towards and participation in randomised clinical trials in oncology: a review of the literature. Ann Oncol. 2000;11(8):939–945. doi: 10.1023/A:1008342222205. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cox K, McGarry J. Why patients don't take part in cancer clinical trials: an overview of the literature. European journal of cancer care. 2003;12(2):114–122. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2354.2003.00396.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ross S, Grant A, Counsell C, Gillespie W, Russell I, Prescott R. Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 1999;52(12):1143–1156. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00141-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mapstone JED, Roberts IG. Strategies to improve recruitment to research studies. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2004. p. MR000013. - PubMed
    1. Lovato LC, Hill K, Hertert S, Hunninghake DB, Probstfield JL. Recruitment for controlled clinical trials: literature summary and annotated bibliography. Controlled clinical trials. 1997;18(4):328–352. doi: 10.1016/S0197-2456(96)00236-X. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources