Why proteins evolve at different rates: the functional hypothesis versus the mistranslation-induced protein misfolding hypothesis
- PMID: 19254718
- DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.02.033
Why proteins evolve at different rates: the functional hypothesis versus the mistranslation-induced protein misfolding hypothesis
Retraction in
-
Retraction notice to "Why proteins evolve at different rates: the functional hypothesis versus the mistranslation-induced protein misfolding hypothesis" [FEBS Lett. 583 (2009) 1053-1059].FEBS Lett. 2009 Sep 17;583(18):3108. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.08.024. FEBS Lett. 2009. PMID: 19760805 No abstract available.
Abstract
Protein evolutionary rates have been presumed to be mostly determined by the density of functionally important amino acids in a given protein. They have been shown to correlate with variables intuitively related to functional importance of proteins, such as protein dispensability and protein-protein interactions. Surprisingly, the best correlate of the evolutionary rates has turned out to be not the functional importance of a protein, but the expression level of the protein. Drummond and Wilke suggest that the dominant role of expression levels in slowing the rate of protein evolution stems from a selection pressure against mistranslation-induced protein misfolding. We will review current evidence for and against different hypotheses on determining evolutionary rates.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
