Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Mar 3;180(5):513-9.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.080570.

Factors associated with suspected drug-facilitated sexual assault

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Factors associated with suspected drug-facilitated sexual assault

Janice Du Mont et al. CMAJ. .

Abstract

Background: There has been little systematic investigation of widespread reports of drugging and sexual assault. We sought to determine the prevalence of and factors associated with suspected drug-facilitated sexual assault.

Methods: Between June 2005 and March 2007, a total of 977 consecutive sexual assault victims underwent screening for suspected drugging at 7 hospital-based sexual assault treatment centres. We defined victims of drug-facilitated sexual assault as those who presented to a centre within about 72 hours of being assaulted and who provided at least 1 valid reason for suspecting that she or he had been drugged and sexually assaulted. We used logistic regression modelling to compare victims of suspected drug-facilitated sexual assault with other sexual assault victims, controlling for covariates.

Results: In total, 882 victims were eligible for inclusion in the study. Of these, 855 (96.9%) were women, and 184 (20.9%) met the criteria for suspected drug-facilitated sexual assault. Compared with other victims, victims of drug-facilitated sexual assault were more likely to have presented to a large urban centre for care (odds ratio [OR] 2.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47-3.65), to be employed (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.34-2.76), to have consumed over-the-counter medications (OR 3.97, 95% CI 2.47-6.38) and street drugs (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.12-2.62) in the 72 hours before being examined and to have used alcohol before the assault (OR 4.00, 95% CI 2.53-6.32).

Interpretation: Suspected drug-facilitated sexual assault is a common problem. Sexual assault services should be tailored to meet the needs of those experiencing this type of victimization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Figure 1: Screening of sexual assault victims for suspected drug-facilitated sexual assault.

Comment in

  • Drug-facilitated sexual assault.
    Butler B, Welch J. Butler B, et al. CMAJ. 2009 Mar 3;180(5):493-4. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090006. CMAJ. 2009. PMID: 19255067 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McGregor MJ, Lipowska M, Shah S, et al. An exploratory analysis of suspected drug-facilitated sexual assault seen in a hospital emergency department. Women Health 2003;37:71-80. - PubMed
    1. Hindmarch I. Myths, medicine and the media. Hum Psychopharmacol Clin Exp 1999;14:223-4.
    1. Dorandeu AH, Pagès CA, Sordino MC, et al. A case in south-eastern France: a review of drug facilitated sexual assault in European and English-speaking countries. J Clin Forensic Med 2006;13:253-61. - PubMed
    1. Hall JA, Moore CB. Drug facilitated sexual assault — a review. J Forensic Leg Med 2008;15:291-7. - PubMed
    1. Kilpatrick DG, Resnick HS, Ruggiero KJ, et al. Drug-facilitated, incapacitated, and forcible rape: a national study. Charleston (SC): Medical University of South Carolina, National Crime Victims Research and Treatment Center; 2007. Available: www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/219181.pdf (accessed 2009 Jan. 26).

Publication types

MeSH terms