Stage-specific outcomes of patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma: a comparison of the international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics and american joint committee on cancer staging systems
- PMID: 19255317
- PMCID: PMC3646302
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.8366
Stage-specific outcomes of patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma: a comparison of the international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics and american joint committee on cancer staging systems
Abstract
Purpose: Uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is staged by the modified International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for uterine cancer. We aimed to determine whether the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) soft tissue sarcoma (STS) staging system is more accurate in predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Patients and methods: Patients with uterine LMS who presented at our institution from 1982 to 2005 were staged retrospectively according to a modified FIGO staging system and the AJCC STS staging system. The predictive accuracy of the two staging systems was compared using concordance estimation.
Results: Two hundred nineteen patients had sufficient clinical and pathologic information to be staged under both systems; 132 patients were upstaged using the AJCC staging system, whereas only four were downstaged. Stage-specific PFS and OS rates for stages I, II, and III differed substantially between the two staging systems. In both systems, there was prognostic overlap between stages II and III. Thus, despite the marked stage-specific differences in 5-year PFS and OS rates for stages I, II, and III, both systems had similar concordance indices.
Conclusion: Estimates of stage-specific PFS and OS for uterine LMS were altered substantially when using the AJCC versus FIGO staging system. Adjuvant treatment strategies should be tested in patients at substantial risk for disease progression and death. Neither the FIGO nor AJCC staging system is ideal for identifying such patients, suggesting a need for a uterine LMS-specific staging system to better target patients for trials of adjuvant therapies.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A nomogram to predict postresection 5-year overall survival for patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma.Cancer. 2012 Feb 1;118(3):660-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26333. Epub 2011 Jul 12. Cancer. 2012. PMID: 21751199 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of current staging systems and a novel staging system for uterine leiomyosarcoma.Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013 Jun;23(5):869-76. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182916a1e. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23669444
-
Predictive value of FIGO and AJCC staging systems in patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma.Eur J Cancer. 2009 Nov;45(16):2818-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.06.030. Epub 2009 Jul 31. Eur J Cancer. 2009. PMID: 19647426
-
Cervical Cancer: 2018 Revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Staging System and the Role of Imaging.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 May;214(5):1182-1195. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21819. Epub 2020 Mar 17. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020. PMID: 32182097 Review.
-
FIGO stage, histology, histologic grade, age and race as prognostic factors in determining survival for cancers of the female gynecological system: an analysis of 1973-87 SEER cases of cancers of the endometrium, cervix, ovary, vulva, and vagina.Semin Surg Oncol. 1994 Jan-Feb;10(1):31-46. doi: 10.1002/ssu.2980100107. Semin Surg Oncol. 1994. PMID: 8115784 Review.
Cited by
-
Can American Joint Committee on Cancer prognostic groups be individualized in patients undergoing surgery for Stage IV invasive upper tract Urothelial Carcinoma?J Cancer. 2021 Feb 2;12(7):2023-2029. doi: 10.7150/jca.50417. eCollection 2021. J Cancer. 2021. PMID: 33754000 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a Multi-Institutional Prediction Model for Three-Year Survival Status in Patients with Uterine Leiomyosarcoma (AGOG11-022/QCGC1302 Study).Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 14;13(10):2378. doi: 10.3390/cancers13102378. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34069227 Free PMC article.
-
A nomogram to predict postresection 5-year overall survival for patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma.Cancer. 2012 Feb 1;118(3):660-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26333. Epub 2011 Jul 12. Cancer. 2012. PMID: 21751199 Free PMC article.
-
Current and future options in the management and treatment of uterine sarcoma.Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2014 Jan;6(1):21-8. doi: 10.1177/1758834013513314. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24381658 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Long-Lasting Response to Trabectedin in a Patient with Metastatic Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: A Case Report.Case Rep Oncol. 2018 Feb 9;11(1):81-89. doi: 10.1159/000486638. eCollection 2018 Jan-Apr. Case Rep Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29515415 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Harlow BL, Weiss NS, Lofton S. The epidemiology of sarcomas of the uterus. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1986;76:399–402. - PubMed
-
- Echt G, Jepson J, Steel J, et al. Treatment of uterine sarcomas. Cancer. 1990;66:35–39. - PubMed
-
- Berchuck A, Rubin SC, Hoskins WJ, et al. Treatment of uterine leiomyosarcoma. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;71:845–850. - PubMed
-
- Major FJ, Blessing JA, Silverberg SG, et al. Prognostic factors in early-stage uterine sarcoma. A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer. 1993;71(suppl 4):1702–1709. - PubMed
-
- Hannigan EV, Gomez LG. Uterine leiomyosarcoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979;134:557–564. - PubMed