A comparison of oral chloral hydrate and sublingual midazolam sedation for echocardiogram in children
- PMID: 19255992
A comparison of oral chloral hydrate and sublingual midazolam sedation for echocardiogram in children
Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of oral chloral hydrate and sublingual midazolam to sedate the children undergoing echocardiography.
Material and method: A double-blind, randomized trial study in the children judged to require sedation prior echocardiogram were performed. Two hundred sixty-four patients between 6 months and 5 years of age were randomized to chloral hydrate or midazolam groups. Either 50 mg/kg of chloral hydrate orally or 0.3 mg/kg of midazolam sublingually was given in each groups. If the child was not responded within 30 minutes after the first dose, another half dose of each drug for the second dose will be required. The action duration time, sedation score level and the ability to complete echocardiogram were collected.
Results: Both groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, body weight, underlying heart disease, baseline O2 saturation and functional heart classification. The children in chloral hydrate group needed the second dose for sedation more than midazolam group (10.6%, 5.3% p = 0.111). The onset, action duration and total study time were significantly shorter in midazolam than in chloral hydrate group (p < 0.001). The number of the patients who had the action duration within the optimal time (< 45 min) were significantly more cases in midazolam than in chloral hydrate group (93.1%, 43.5% p < 0.001). Success rate of echocardiogram was 99.2% in each group. There was no difference in echocardiographic time performed in both groups. The children in chloral hydrate group had deeper in level of sedation (p < 0.001). Both groups showed no significant difference in term of the ability to complete echocardiographic examination. The reaction of the children to take the medication and the number of the patients who had systemic O2 saturation change more than 5%from the baseline were higher in chloral hydrate group significantly (14.4%, 4.5% p = 0.006 and 9.9%, 3.1% p = 0.025).
Conclusion: Sublingual midazolam at the dose of 0.3 mg/kg can be used to sedate the children at age group between 6 months to 5 years who undergoing echocardiogram with comparable rate of success and safety as 50 mg/kg of chloral hydrate orally. The less depth in the level of consciousness after sedation with midazolam compare to chloral hydrate may be advantage in a high risk patient to avoid deep sedation but may be disadvantage in case who need more comprehensive echocardiographic evaluation.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of intranasal midazolam, intranasal ketamine, and oral chloral hydrate for conscious sedation during paediatric echocardiography: results of a prospective randomised study.Cardiol Young. 2019 Sep;29(9):1189-1195. doi: 10.1017/S1047951119001835. Cardiol Young. 2019. PMID: 31451130 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized, blinded comparison of chloral hydrate and midazolam sedation in children undergoing echocardiography.Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2001 Jul;40(7):381-7. doi: 10.1177/000992280104000704. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2001. PMID: 11491133 Clinical Trial.
-
Oral chloral hydrate vs. intranasal midazolam for sedation during computerized tomography.Indian Pediatr. 2013 Feb;50(2):233-5. doi: 10.1007/s13312-013-0065-5. Epub 2012 Jul 5. Indian Pediatr. 2013. PMID: 23024102 Clinical Trial.
-
The safety and efficacy of chloral hydrate sedation for pediatric ophthalmic procedures: a retrospective review.J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2014 May-Jun;51(3):154-9. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20140311-01. Epub 2014 Mar 18. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2014. PMID: 24627951 Review.
-
Intranasal dexmedetomidine versus oral chloral hydrate for diagnostic procedures sedation in infants and toddlers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(9):e19001. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019001. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 32118711 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Non-Parenteral Medications for Procedural Sedation in Children- A Narrative: Review Article.Iran J Child Neurol. 2015 Summer;9(3):1-8. Iran J Child Neurol. 2015. PMID: 26401146 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pediatric chloral hydrate poisonings and death following outpatient procedural sedation.J Med Toxicol. 2014 Jun;10(2):219-22. doi: 10.1007/s13181-013-0358-z. J Med Toxicol. 2014. PMID: 24532346 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of Oral Midazolam and Chloral Hydrate Before Echocardiography in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial.Glob Pediatr Health. 2017 Oct 16;4:2333794X17735972. doi: 10.1177/2333794X17735972. eCollection 2017. Glob Pediatr Health. 2017. PMID: 29085865 Free PMC article.
-
Chloral Hydrate: Is It Still Being Used? Are There Safer Alternatives?P T. 2019 Aug;44(8):444-459. P T. 2019. PMID: 31447530 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and efficacy of oral Triclofos in the ophthalmic evaluation of children with pediatric glaucoma: An observational study.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan;69(1):83-86. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_457_20. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021. PMID: 33323581 Free PMC article.