Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2009 Mar 3;150(5):325-35.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-5-200903030-00008.

Patient-physician connectedness and quality of primary care

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Patient-physician connectedness and quality of primary care

Steven J Atlas et al. Ann Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: Valid measurement of physician performance requires accurate identification of patients for whom a physician is responsible. Among all patients seen by a physician, some will be more strongly connected to their physician than others, but the effect of connectedness on measures of physician performance is not known.

Objective: To determine whether patient-physician connectedness affects measures of clinical performance.

Design: Population-based cohort study.

Setting: Academic network of 4 community health centers and 9 hospital-affiliated primary care practices.

Patients: 155 590 adults with 1 or more visits to a study practice from 2003 to 2005.

Measurements: A validated algorithm was used to connect patients to either 1 of 181 physicians or 1 of 13 practices in which they received most of their care. Performance measures included breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening in eligible patients; hemoglobin A(1c) measurement and control in patients with diabetes; and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol measurement and control in patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease.

Results: Overall, 92 315 patients (59.3%) were connected to a specific physician, whereas 53 669 patients (34.5%) were connected only to a specific practice and 9606 patients (6.2%) could not be connected to a physician or practice. The proportion of patients in a practice who could be connected to a physician varied markedly (45.6% to 71.2% of patients per practice; P < 0.001). Physician-connected patients were significantly more likely than practice-connected patients to receive guideline-consistent care (for example, adjusted mammography rates were 78.1% vs. 65.9% [P < 0.001] and adjusted hemoglobin A(1c) rates were 90.3% vs. 74.9% [P < 0.001]). Receipt of preventive care varied more by whether patients were more or less connected to a physician than by race or ethnicity.

Limitation: Patient-physician connectedness was assessed in 1 primary care network.

Conclusion: Patients seen in primary care practices seem to be variably connected with a specific physician, and less connected patients are less likely to receive guideline-consistent care.

Funding: National Cancer Institute.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Method of connecting patients with specific primary care physicians or practices MGH = Massachusetts General Hospital; PCP = primary care physician. The square boxes represent the patient population seen in the MGH primary care network and their initial assessment based on listed provider. The hexagonal boxes represent the algorithms that connect patients to a specific physician or practice. The rounded boxes represent the disposition of the primary care population based on patient–physician connectedness. * Patients younger than 18 years and those who were deceased are also included in this category.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient connectedness in the 13 practice sites *Community health center.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Patient connectedness, by race or ethnicity.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Breast cancer screening rates, by patient connectedness and by race or ethnicity Adjusted rates of breast cancer screening with mammography in the previous 2 years among eligible women age 42 to 69 years.

Comment in

  • Is there a personal doctor in the house?
    Bindman AB. Bindman AB. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Mar 3;150(5):351-2. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-5-200903030-00012. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19258561 No abstract available.

Summary for patients in

References

    1. Ma J, Stafford RS. Quality of US outpatient care: temporal changes and racial/ethnic disparities. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1354–61. - PubMed
    1. Chassin MR, Galvin RW. The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. JAMA. 1998;280:1000–5. - PubMed
    1. Schuster MA, McGlynn EA, Brook RH. How good is the quality of health care in the United States? Milbank Q. 1998;76:517–63. 509. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, Keesey J, Hicks J, DeCristofaro A, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2635–45. - PubMed
    1. Starfield B. Primary Care: Concept, Evaluation, and Policy. New York: Oxford Univ Pr; 1992.

Publication types