Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jul;17(7):883-9.
doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.254. Epub 2009 Mar 4.

Personal genomics services: whose genomes?

Affiliations

Personal genomics services: whose genomes?

David Gurwitz et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009 Jul.

Abstract

New companies offering personal whole-genome information services over the internet are dynamic and highly visible players in the personal genomics field. For fees currently ranging from US$399 to US$2500 and a vial of saliva, individuals can now purchase online access to their individual genetic information regarding susceptibility to a range of chronic diseases and phenotypic traits based on a genome-wide SNP scan. Most of the companies offering such services are based in the United States, but their clients may come from nearly anywhere in the world. Although the scientific validity, clinical utility and potential future implications of such services are being hotly debated, several ethical and regulatory questions related to direct-to-consumer (DTC) marketing strategies of genetic tests have not yet received sufficient attention. For example, how can we minimize the risk of unauthorized third parties from submitting other people's DNA for testing? Another pressing question concerns the ownership of (genotypic and phenotypic) information, as well as the unclear legal status of customers regarding their own personal information. Current legislation in the US and Europe falls short of providing clear answers to these questions. Until the regulation of personal genomics services catches up with the technology, we call upon commercial providers to self-regulate and coordinate their activities to minimize potential risks to individual privacy. We also point out some specific steps, along the trustee model, that providers of DTC personal genomics services as well as regulators and policy makers could consider for addressing some of the concerns raised below.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kaiser J. Breakthrough of the year. It's all about me. Science. 2007;318:1843. - PubMed
    1. Blow N. Genomics: the personal side of genomics. Nature. 2007;449:627–630. - PubMed
    1. Hunter DJ, Khoury MJ, Drazen JM. Letting the genome out of the bottle – will we get our wish. New Engl J Med. 2008;358:105–107. - PubMed
    1. van Ommen GB, Cornel MC. Recreational genomics? Dreams and fears on genetic susceptibility screening. Eur J Hum Genet. 2008;16:403–404. - PubMed
    1. Feero WG, Guttmacher AE, Collins FS. The genome gets personal—almost. J Am Med Assoc. 2008;299:1351–1352. - PubMed