Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Sep;4(3):311-8.
doi: 10.1007/s11552-009-9167-x. Epub 2009 Mar 4.

Which outcome measure is the best? Evaluating responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire, the Michigan Hand Questionnaire and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale following hand and wrist surgery

Catherine R McMillan  1 , Paul A Binhammer
Affiliations

Which outcome measure is the best? Evaluating responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire, the Michigan Hand Questionnaire and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale following hand and wrist surgery

Catherine R McMillan et al. Hand (N Y). 2009 Sep.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine and compare the responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, the Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ), and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, wrist pain, finger contracture, or tumor. Eighty-one subjects prospectively completed each questionnaire shortly before and 3 and 6 months after surgery. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Newman-Keuls multiple comparison tests. Responsiveness to clinical change was calculated using standardized response means. The DASH was responsive for those with carpal tunnel syndrome (0.77), wrist pain (0.61), and tumor (0.55); the MHQ was responsive for those with carpal tunnel syndrome (1.04), wrist pain (0.87), and finger contracture (0.62); and the PSFS was responsive for those with carpal tunnel syndrome (0.65) and finger contracture (0.64). The interval during which the highest responsiveness occurred for the carpal tunnel, wrist pain, and finger contracture groups was the preoperative to 6-month period. The tumor group experienced the highest responsiveness during the preoperative to 3-month period. Our results indicate that one or more of the instruments evaluated are suitable for outcomes research related to surgery to treat carpal tunnel syndrome, wrist pain, finger contracture, and tumor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
DASH, MHQ, and PSFS mean preoperative, 3-month postoperative, and 6-month postoperative scores. a Whole sample (n = 81); b carpal tunnel group (n = 20); c wrist pain group (n = 21); d finger contracture group (n = 34); e tumor group (n = 6). *Three-month mean score significantly differs from respective preoperative mean score. ‡Six-month mean score significantly differs from respective 3-month mean score. DASH scores are reversed so that a higher score reflects less disability. Error bars represent standard deviation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Standardized response means (SRM) for all questionnaires and all groups from preoperative to 3-month, preoperative to 6-month, and 3- to 6-month periods. a Whole sample (n = 81); b carpal tunnel group (n = 20); c wrist pain group (n = 21); d finger contracture group (n = 34); e tumor group (n = 6).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Standardized response means (SRM) for all questionnaires for the preoperative to 3-month period including subjects who completed at least baseline and 3-month questionnaires. a Carpal tunnel group (n = 46); b wrist pain group (n = 33); c finger contracture group (n = 61); d tumor group (n = 13).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00407-3', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00407-3'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '11750189', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11750189/'}]}
    2. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Katz JN, et al. A taxonomy for responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:1204–17. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00407-3. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '11382253', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11382253/'}]}
    2. Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, et al. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther. 2001;14:128–46. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1007/s00264-007-0368-z', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0368-z'}, {'type': 'PMC', 'value': 'PMC2219945', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2219945/'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '17534619', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17534619/'}]}
    2. Changulani M, Okonkwo U, Keswani T, et al. Outcome evaluation measures for wrist and hand: which one to choose. Int Orthop. 2008;32:1–6. doi:10.1007/s00264-007-0368-z. - PMC - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '9256870', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9256870/'}]}
    2. Chatman AB, Hyams SP, Neel JM, et al. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: measurement properties in patients with knee dysfunction. Phys Ther. 1997;77:820–9. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1053/jhsu.2002.33706', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2002.33706'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '12132091', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12132091/'}]}
    2. Chung KC, Kotsis SV. Outcomes of multiple microvascular toe transfers for reconstruction in 2 patients with digitless hands: 2- and 4-year follow-up case reports. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2002;27:652–8. doi:10.1053/jhsu.2002.33706. - PubMed