Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Feb;15(1):4-9.

The revised TNM staging system for lung cancer

Affiliations
  • PMID: 19262443
Review

The revised TNM staging system for lung cancer

Ramon Rami-Porta et al. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Feb.

Abstract

The International Staging Committee (ISC) of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) collected 68,463 patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer and 13,032 patients with small cell lung cancer, registered or diagnosed from 1990 to 2000, whose records had adequate information for analyzing the tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) classification. The T, N, and M descriptors were analyzed, and recommendations for changes in the seventh edition of the TNM classification were proposed based on differences in survival. For the T component, tumor size was found to have prognostic relevance, and its analysis led to recommendations to subclassify T1 tumors into T1a (< or = 2 cm) and T1b (>2 - < or = 3 cm) and T2 tumors into T2a (>3 - < or = 5 cm) and T2b (>5 - < or = 7 cm), and to reclassify T2 tumors > 7 cm into T3. Furthermore, with additional nodules in the same lobe as the primary tumors, T4 tumors would be reclassified as T3; with additional nodules in another ipsilateral lobe, M1 as T4; and with pleural dissemination, T4 as M1. There were no changes in the N category. In the M category, M1 was recommended to be subclassified into M1a (contralateral lung nodules and pleural dissemination) and M1b (distant metastasis). The proposed changes for the new stage grouping were to upstage T2bN0M0 from stage IB to stage IIA, and to downstage T2aN1M0 from stage IIB to stage IIA and T4N0-N1M0 from stage IIIB to stage IIIA. The proposed changes better differentiate tumors of different prognoses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources