Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 May-Jun;21(3):365-70.
doi: 10.1002/ajhb.20892.

Digit ratios (2D:4D) determined by computer-assisted analysis are more reliable than those using physical measurements, photocopies, and printed scans

Affiliations

Digit ratios (2D:4D) determined by computer-assisted analysis are more reliable than those using physical measurements, photocopies, and printed scans

Heather C Allaway et al. Am J Hum Biol. 2009 May-Jun.

Abstract

Prenatal androgens influence the second to fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) of hands with men having lower ratios than women. Numerous methods are used to assess 2D:4D including, physical measurements with calipers, and measurements made from photocopies, scanned images, digital photographs, radiographs, and scaled tubes. Although each method appears relatively reliable, agreement upon a gold standard is necessary to better explore the putative effects of prenatal androgens. Our objective was to assess the level of intra and interobserver reliability when evaluating 2D:4D using four techniques: (1) physical measurements, (2) photocopies, (3) printed scanned images, and (4) computer-assisted image analysis. Physical measurements, photocopies, and printed scanned images were measured with Vernier calipers. Scanned images were also measured with computer-based calipers. Measurements were made in 30 men and 30 women at two different time points, by three experienced observers. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess the level of reliability. Intraobserver reliability was best for computer-assisted (0.957), followed by photocopies (0.939), physical measurements (0.925), and printed scans (0.842; P = 0.015). Interobserver reliability was also greatest for computer-assisted (0.892), followed by photocopies (0.858), physical measurements (0.795), and printed scans (0.761; P = 0.001). Mean 2D:4D from physical measurements were higher than all other techniques (P < 0.0001). Digit ratios determined from computer-assisted, physical measurements, and printed scans were more reliable in men than women (P = 0.009, P = 0.017, and P = 0.012, respectively). In summary, 2D:4D determined from computer-assisted analysis yielded the most accurate and consistent measurements among observers. Investigations of 2D:4D should use computer-assisted measurements over alternate methods whenever possible.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abbott DH, Padmanabhan V, Dumesic DA. Contributions of androgen and estrogen to fetal programming of ovarian dysfunction. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2006;4:17. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bailey AA, Hurd PL. Finger length ratio (2D:4D) correlates with physical aggression in men but not in women. Biol Psychol. 2005;68:215–222. - PubMed
    1. Bloski TG, Lujan ME, Chizen DR, Pierson RA. Digit ratios as anatomical evidence of prenatal androgen exposure in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society; Calgary, Alberta, Canada. November 26–29; 2008. p. 65. [Abstract]
    1. Brown WM, Finn CJ, Cooke BM, Breedlove SM. Differences in finger length ratios between self-identified “butch” and “femme” lesbians. Arch Sex Behav. 2002;31:123–127. - PubMed
    1. Burriss RP, Little AC, Nelson EC. 2D:4D and sexually dimorphic facial characteristics. Arch Sex Behav. 2007;36:377–384. - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources