Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Mar;89(2):142-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2009.01.002. Epub 2009 Mar 4.

Post-exposure vaccination against Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Affiliations

Post-exposure vaccination against Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Marcela Henao-Tamayo et al. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2009 Mar.

Abstract

Enhancing immunity to tuberculosis in animal models after exposure to the infection has proved difficult. In this study we used a newly described flow cytometric technique to monitor changes in cell populations accumulating in the lungs of guinea pigs challenged by low-dose aerosol infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis and vaccinated 10 days later. On day 40 after infection the fusion protein F36 and a pool of Ag85A and ESAT6 vaccines had significant effects on the bacterial load, showed increased expression of the activation marker CD45+ on CD4+ T cells, and reduced numbers of heterophils. Lung pathology and pathology scores were marginally improved in animals given these vaccines, but lymph node pathology was not influenced. Despite early effects no changes in long-term survival were seen. These results suggest that a single post-exposure vaccination can initially slow the disease process. However, this effect is transient, but this could be of use in an multidrug resistant/extremely drug resistant outbreak situation because it could potentially slow the infection long enough to complete drug susceptibility testing and initiate effective chemotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests. None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Bacterial growth in the lungs and Kaplan-Meier analysis of the survival of guinea pigs infected with M. tuberculosis and receiving post-exposure vaccines. Bacterial counts in the lungs (panel A), on day 40 from guinea pigs infected with a low dose of M. tuberculosis and receiving post exposure vaccine 10 days after infection were compared. Results are expressed as the average (n=5) of the bacterial load in each group expressed as Log10CFU, standard error mean (SEM) and protection. Median survival days (panel B) of Hartley guinea pigs (n=10) vaccinated with, Ag85/ESAT6 (solid square), F36 (solid triangle), BCG control (solid inverted triangle), adjuvant control (solid diamond), and saline control (solid circle) are compared.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Light photomicrographs of lungs (panel A, A–E) from representative guinea pigs that were guinea pigs infected with M. tuberculosis and receiving post-exposure vaccines saline control (A, A), adjuvant control (A, B), BCG control (A, C), Ag85A+ESAT6 (A, D) and F36 (A, E) on day 40 are shown. [bar denotes H&E staining, 20X]. The lesion scores (panel B) of lungs were calculated as described in Materials and methods section for all the four groups on day 40 of the infection. The scores are presented as total mean lesion values. On day 40, smaller lesions (arrows) and reduced lesion scores were seen in the animals vaccinated with the F36 fusion protein compared to the saline control, adjuvant control, BCG control, Ag85A+ESAT6. Results are expressed as the mean lesion scores (±SEM, n=4). (Student t-test, *p≤0.05) compared to adjuvant control guinea pigs.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Light photomicrographs of spleens (panel A, A–E) from representative guinea pigs that were guinea pigs infected with M. tuberculosis and receiving post-exposure vaccines saline control (A, A), adjuvant control (A, B), BCG control (A, C), Ag85A+ESAT6 (A, D) and F36 (A, E) on day 40 are shown. [bar denotes H&E staining, 20X]. The lesion scores (panel B) of spleens were calculated as described in Materials and methods section for all the four groups on day 40 of the infection. The scores are presented as total mean lesion values. On day 40, smaller lesions (arrows) and reduced lesion scores were seen in the animals post-exposure vaccinated with the BCG control, F36 fusion protein and Ag85/ESAT6 compared to the saline control and adjuvant control. Results are expressed as the mean lesion scores (±SEM, n=4). (Student t-test, *p≤0.05) compared to adjuvant control guinea pigs.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Numbers of T cell expressing CD45+ in the lungs of guinea pigs infected with M. tuberculosis and receiving post-exposure vaccines. Lungs obtained from guinea pigs infected with M. tuberculosis and receiving post-exposure vaccines saline control (solid bar), adjuvant control (open bar), BCG control (dotted bar), Ag85A+ESAT6 (hatched bar) and F36 (line bar) on day 40 are shown. Guinea pig lungs (n=5) were assayed by flow cytometry, and numbers of cells per 1.0 gram of tissue were calculated from these assays. Panels A show the total numbers of MIL4neg CD4+ cells and MIL4neg CD8+ cells respectively. Panels B show the totalcells/1.0 gram of tissue of CD4+ CD45+ in the lungs of post-exposure vaccinated guinea pigs. Panel C and D shows a representative flow cytometric dot plot from isotype control and guinea pigs receiving post-exposure vaccines saline control, adjuvant control, BCG control, Ag85A+ESAT6 and F36. Results are expressed as the mean cells/1.0 gram of tissue of each analyzed cell population (±SEM, n=4). (Student t-test, *p≤0.05) compared to adjuvant control guinea pigs.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Numbers of B cell and MIL4+ heterophil (granulocyte) of guinea pigs infected with M. tuberculosis and receiving post-exposure vaccines. Lung obtained from guinea pigs infected with M. tuberculosis and receiving post-exposure vaccines saline control (solid bar), adjuvant control (open bar), BCG control (dotted bar), Ag85A+ESAT6 (hatched bar) and F36 (line bar) on day 40 are shown. Guinea pig lungs (n=4) were assayed by flow cytometry, and numbers of cells per 1.0 gram of tissue were calculated from these assays. Panels A show the total numbers of MIL4neg B cells+ cells and panel B shows the MIL4+ cells respectively. Results are expressed as the numbers of MIL4neg B cells and MIL4+ granulocytes (±SEM, n=4). (Student t-test, *p≤0.05) compared to adjuvant control guinea pigs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Skeiky YA, Sadoff JC. Advances in tuberculosis vaccine strategies. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4:469–76. - PubMed
    1. Kaufmann SH. Is the development of a new tuberculosis vaccine possible? Nat Med. 2000;6:955–60. - PubMed
    1. Orme IM. Preclinical testing of new vaccines for tuberculosis: a comprehensive review. Vaccine. 2006;24:2–19. - PubMed
    1. Turner J, Rhoades ER, Keen M, Belisle JT, Frank AA, Orme IM. Effective preexposure tuberculosis vaccines fail to protect when they are given in an immunotherapeutic mode. Infect Immun. 2000;68:1706–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taylor JL, Turner OC, Basaraba RJ, Belisle JT, Huygen K, Orme IM. Pulmonary necrosis resulting from DNA vaccination against tuberculosis. Infect Immun. 2003;71:2192–8. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances