The hearing conservation amendment: 25 years later
- PMID: 19265247
- DOI: 10.4103/1463-1741.45306
The hearing conservation amendment: 25 years later
Abstract
It has been twenty-five years since the final version of the Hearing Conservation Amendment was issued by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration in the U.S. Department of Labor. Since that time, some things have changed and others have stayed exactly the same. Certainly the noise-exposed workforce is more knowledgeable about the hazards of noise, and the use of hearing protection devices (HPDs) has greatly increased. There have been significant strides in the technology for measuring noise and for protecting hearing through HPDs. But there is considerable room for improvement. Some of the noise regulation's provisions are embarrassingly outdated, some are in dire need of improvement, and others, such as the requirements for engineering noise control, are not being enforced. Sadly, there seems to be little progress in reducing overall noise exposure levels. What needs to be done at this point is a major overhaul of the noise regulation: recommitment to engineering noise control; reduction of the permissible exposure limit (PEL) to 85 dBA; a shift to the 3-dBA exchange rate; and a nationwide assessment of hearing loss in American workers to determine the effectiveness of current hearing conservation measures to identify and address the weaknesses in programs and regulations.
Similar articles
-
Noise exposure and hearing loss prevention programmes after 20 years of regulations in the United States.Occup Environ Med. 2006 May;63(5):343-51. doi: 10.1136/oem.2005.024588. Epub 2006 Mar 21. Occup Environ Med. 2006. PMID: 16551755 Free PMC article.
-
The contribution of focus groups in the evaluation of hearing conservation program (HCP) effectiveness.J Safety Res. 2004;35(1):91-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2003.12.001. J Safety Res. 2004. PMID: 14992850
-
Engineering measures can muffle hazards heard in noisy work areas.Occup Health Saf. 1993 Sep;62(9):82-9. Occup Health Saf. 1993. PMID: 8414376
-
Historical review of efforts to reduce noise-induced hearing loss in the United States.Am J Ind Med. 2017 Jun;60(6):569-577. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22627. Am J Ind Med. 2017. PMID: 28514024 Review.
-
Construction noise: exposure, effects, and the potential for remediation; a review and analysis.AIHA J (Fairfax, Va). 2002 Nov-Dec;63(6):768-89. doi: 10.1080/15428110208984768. AIHA J (Fairfax, Va). 2002. PMID: 12570087 Review.
Cited by
-
Early hearing slope as a predictor of subsequent hearing trajectory in a noise-exposed occupational cohort.J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Nov;146(5):4044. doi: 10.1121/1.5132542. J Acoust Soc Am. 2019. PMID: 31795687 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of interventions on use of hearing protectors among farm operators: A randomized controlled trial.Int J Audiol. 2016;55 Suppl 1(0):S3-12. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1122239. Epub 2016 Jan 14. Int J Audiol. 2016. PMID: 26766172 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Protocol of a test of hearing health education programs for farm and rural youth.BMC Public Health. 2015 Oct 16;15:1061. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2393-y. BMC Public Health. 2015. PMID: 26475373 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Progress and recommendations of developing occupational exposure limits for noise-A systematic review.Heliyon. 2024 Sep 12;10(18):e37878. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37878. eCollection 2024 Sep 30. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 39323817 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss: a Cochrane systematic review.Int J Audiol. 2014 Mar;53 Suppl 2(0 2):S84-96. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.857436. Int J Audiol. 2014. PMID: 24564697 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical