Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Apr;36(4):232-8.
doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181901e32.

Sexual partner characteristics and sexually transmitted diseases among adolescents and young adults

Affiliations

Sexual partner characteristics and sexually transmitted diseases among adolescents and young adults

Stephanie A S Staras et al. Sex Transm Dis. 2009 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Among adolescents and young adults, the extent that partner characteristics account for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) in context of individual sexual activities and demographic characteristics is unclear.

Methods: Sexual partner characteristics, individual sexual activities, and STD diagnosis were assessed among 15 to 24-year-old STD clinic attendees from 1999 to 2002 (n = 412). We used exact logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (OR) for several sexual partner characteristics (age discordance, incarceration, STD diagnosis, other partners, alcohol problem, marijuana problem, and a calculated composite variable) adjusting for demographics and individual sexual activities, including condom use.

Results: Sexual partner characteristics associated with STD diagnosis were >or=5 years age discordance [OR = 2.6 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.6, 4.5)] and STD in the past year [OR = 3.4 (95% CI = 2.0, 5.7)]. Even when considering individual sexual activities, composite partner risk was associated with STD diagnosis [intermediate to low OR = 2.1 (95% CI = 1.0, 4.2) and high to low OR = 3.4 (95% CI = 1.6, 7.0)]. Composite individual sexual activities was associated with STD diagnosis when considering demographics [intermediate to low OR = 1.8 (95% CI = 1.0, 3.2), high to low OR = 2.3 (95% CI = 1.2, 4.5)], but not when also considering partner characteristics [intermediate to low OR = 1.6 (95% CI = 0.9, 2.8), high to low OR = 1.8 (95% CI = 0.8, 3.9)].

Conclusions: Among this sample of 15 to 24-year-olds, sexual partner characteristics identified individuals at increased risk of prevalent STDs and were more predictive of STDs than an individual's sexual activities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proportion of adolescents in each individual sexual risk category by composite partner characteristics.

References

    1. Weinstock H, Berman S, Cates W., Jr Sexually transmitted diseases among Am youth: Incidence and prevalence estimates, 2000. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004;36:6–10. - PubMed
    1. Kraut-Becher J, Eisenberg M, Voytek C, et al. Examining racial disparities in HIV: Lessons from sexually transmitted infections research. J Acquir Immun Defic Syndr. 2008;47(suppl 1):S20–S27. - PubMed
    1. Begley E, Crosby RA, DiClemente RJ, et al. Older partners and STD prevalence among pregnant African American teens. Sex Transm Dis. 2003;30:211–213. - PubMed
    1. Boyer CB, Sebro NS, Wibbelsman C, et al. Acquisition of sexually transmitted infections in adolescents attending an urban, general HMO teen clinic. J Adolesc Health. 2006;39:287–290. - PubMed
    1. Auerswald CL, Muth SQ, Brown B, et al. Does partner selection contribute to sex differences in sexually transmitted infection rates among African Am adolescents in San Francisco? Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33:480–484. - PubMed

Publication types