Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jul;7(7):736-42; quiz 710.
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.12.027. Epub 2009 Jan 13.

Adherence to biopsy guidelines for Barrett's esophagus surveillance in the community setting in the United States

Julian A Abrams  1 , Robert C Kapel, Guy M Lindberg, Mohammad H Saboorian, Robert M Genta, Alfred I Neugut, Charles J Lightdale
Affiliations

Adherence to biopsy guidelines for Barrett's esophagus surveillance in the community setting in the United States

Julian A Abrams et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Jul.

Abstract

Background & aims: Current surveillance guidelines for Barrett's esophagus (BE) recommend extensive biopsies to minimize sampling error. Biopsy practice patterns for BE surveillance in the community have not been well-described. We used a national community-based pathology database to analyze adherence to guidelines and to determine whether adherence was associated with dysplasia detection.

Methods: We identified 10,958 cases of established BE in the Caris Diagnostics pathology database from January 2002-April 2007. Demographic, pathologic, and endoscopic data were recorded. Dysplasia was categorized as low grade, high grade, or adenocarcinoma. Adherence was defined as > or =4 esophageal biopsies per 2 cm BE or a ratio > or =2.0. Generalized estimating equation multivariable analysis was performed to assess factors associated with adherence, adjusted for clustering by individual gastroenterologist.

Results: A total of 2245 BE surveillance cases were identified with linked endoscopy reports that recorded BE length and could be assessed for adherence. Adherence to guidelines was seen in 51.2% of cases. In multivariable analysis, longer segment BE was associated with significantly reduced adherence (3-5 cm, odds ratio [OR] 0.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10-0.19; 6-8 cm, OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.03-0.09; > or =9 cm, OR 0.03, 95% CI 0.01-0.07). Stratified by BE length, nonadherence was associated with significantly decreased dysplasia detection (summary OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.35-0.82).

Conclusions: Adherence to BE biopsy guidelines in the community is low, and nonadherence is associated with significantly decreased dysplasia detection. Future studies should identify factors underlying nonadherence as well as mechanisms to increase adherence to guidelines to improve early detection of dysplasia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of surveillance cases used for analysis of adherence to biopsy guidelines in patients with BE.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Adherence to the Seattle biopsy protocol by length of BE. Trend P value < .001.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Adherence to the Seattle biopsy protocol by year of procedure. P value for trend = .03.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Detection of dysplasia (low grade, high grade, or EAC) in cases adherent and nonadherent to the Seattle biopsy protocol, excluding patients with a history of dysplasia. Mantel-Haenszel summary OR for the association between nonadherence and dysplasia detection, stratified by BE length, equals 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35–0.82.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kubo A, Corley DA. Marked regional variation in adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and the gastric cardia in the United States. Cancer. 2002;95:2096–2102. - PubMed
    1. Pohl H, Welch HG. The role of overdiagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:142–146. - PubMed
    1. Shaheen NJ. Advances in Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:1554–1566. - PubMed
    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:43–66. - PubMed
    1. Ries LAG, Melbert D, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2005. Volume 2008. National Cancer Institute; Bethesda, MD: [Accessed: May 27, 2008]. 2008. Available at http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/esoph.html?statfacts_page=esoph.ht....

Publication types