Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jul;70(2):209-20.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.02.002. Epub 2009 Mar 6.

Testing the behavioral interaction and integration of attentional networks

Affiliations

Testing the behavioral interaction and integration of attentional networks

Jin Fan et al. Brain Cogn. 2009 Jul.

Abstract

One current conceptualization of attention subdivides it into functions of alerting, orienting, and executive control. Alerting describes the function of tonically maintaining the alert state and phasically responding to a warning signal. Automatic and voluntary orienting are involved in the selection of information among multiple sensory inputs. Executive control describes a set of more complex operations that include detecting and resolving conflicts in order to control thoughts or behaviors. Converging evidence supports this theory of attention by showing that each function appears to be subserved by anatomically distinct networks in the brain and differentially innervated by various neuromodulatory systems. Although much research has been dedicated to understanding the functional separation of these networks in both healthy and disease states, the interaction and integration among these networks still remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to characterize possible behavioral interaction and integration in healthy adult volunteers using a revised attention network test (ANT-R) with cue-target interval and cue validity manipulations. We found that whereas alerting improves overall response speed, it exerts negative influence on executive control under certain conditions. A valid orienting cue enhances but an invalid cue diminishes the ability of executive control to overcome conflict. The results support the hypothesis of functional integration and interaction of these brain networks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic of the Attention Network Test (ANT)
In each trial, depending on the cue condition (none, double, and valid or invalid cues), a cue box flashes for 100 ms. After a variable duration (0, 400, or 800 ms), the target (the center arrow) and two flanker arrows on the left and right side (congruent or incongruent flankers) are presented for 500 ms. The participant makes a response to the target’s direction. The post-target fixation period varies between 2000 to 12000 ms.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Attentional network and two-way interaction scores in terms of RT (ms) and accuracy (%) differences. The error bars represent standard error.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Alerting by flanker conflict processing interaction in terms of RT (ms) and accuracy (%) differences.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Orienting by flanker conflict processing interaction in terms of RT (ms) and accuracy (%) differences.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Cue validity by flanker conflict processing interaction in terms of RT (ms) and accuracy (%) differences.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Flanker congruency by location congruency interaction in terms of RT (ms) and accuracy (%) differences.

References

    1. Behrens TE, Woolrich MW, Walton ME, Rushworth MF. Learning the value of information in an uncertain world. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10(9):1214–1221. - PubMed
    1. Benes FM. Emerging principles of altered neural circuitry in schizophrenia. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2000;31(2–3):251–269. - PubMed
    1. Bish JP, Ferrante SM, McDonald-McGinn D, Zackai E, Simon TJ. Maladaptive conflict monitoring as evidence for executive dysfunction in children with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Dev Sci. 2005;8(1):36–43. - PubMed
    1. Botvinick MM, Braver TS, Barch DM, Carter CS, Cohen JD. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review. 2001;108(3):624–652. - PubMed
    1. Botvinick MM, Nystrom LE, Fissell K, Carter CS, Cohen JD. Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature. 1999;402(6758):179–181. - PubMed

Publication types