Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Feb;9(1):22-5.
doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.9-1-22.

Is medical research within the UK in decline? A study of publication rates from the British Society of Gastroenterology from 1994 to 2002

Andrew D Hopper  1 , Robert J Atkinson, Adam Razak, Ashrafur Rahim, Anisha Perera, Georgina Jones, David S Sanders
Affiliations

Is medical research within the UK in decline? A study of publication rates from the British Society of Gastroenterology from 1994 to 2002

Andrew D Hopper et al. Clin Med (Lond). 2009 Feb.

Abstract

A number of reports have suggested that academic medicine within the UK may be in decline. This article assesses the number and outcome of abstracts presented at consecutive British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) meetings. All abstracts presented at the BSG between 1994 and 2002 were assessed (n=4,096). Full publication rates of abstracts were then compared between meetings. Other abstract characteristics were also analysed. There was a significant downward trend demonstrated for the percentage of abstracts going onto full publication (p=0.02). In 1994, 57.6% of abstracts were subsequently fully published but by 2002 this number had fallen to 30.7%. The results show that the number of abstracts at the BSG which are then fully published has fallen with a significant trend. This observation could be taken as an indicator that there is a decline in research activity within the UK gastroenterology community.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
The number of abstracts that were presented each year at the British Society of Gastroenterology meetings 1994–2002.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
The percentage of abstracts presented each year at the British Society of Gastroenterology meetings that went on to full publication between 1994 and 2002. A significant downward trend is shown (r=−0.761; p=0.02).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
The mean impact factor of journals containing publications arising from abstracts presented each year at the British Society of Gastroenterology meetings between 1994 and 2002 (R=0.7799, r=0.88).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
The mean time taken for abstracts presented each year at the British Society of Gastroenterology meetings between 1994 and 2002 to be fully published. Error bars represent one standard deviation above and below mean.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Quencer R. Grossman R. Unpublished papers perish. Am J Neuroradiol. 1999;20:962–3.
    1. Callaham ML. Wears RL. Weber EJ. Barton C. Young G. Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting. JAMA. 1998;280(3):254–7. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.3.254. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Juzych MS. Shin DH. Coffey J. Juzych L. Shin D. Whatever happened to abstracts from different sections of the association for research in vision and ophthalmology? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34(5):1879–82. - PubMed
    1. Juzych MS. Shin DH. Coffey JB, et al. Pattern of publication of ophthalmic abstracts in peer-reviewed journals. Ophthalmol. 1991;98(4):553–6. - PubMed
    1. Scherer RW. Langenberg P. von Elm E. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts, Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007. p. MR000005. - PubMed