Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Mar;127(3):303-10.
doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2008.567.

Reported eye care utilization and health insurance status among US adults

David J Lee  1 , Byron L Lam, Sahel Arora, Kristopher L Arheart, Kathryn E McCollister, D Diane Zheng, Sharon L Christ, Evelyn P Davila
Affiliations

Reported eye care utilization and health insurance status among US adults

David J Lee et al. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate prevalence and correlates of eye care utilization by means of data from the National Health Interview Survey.

Methods: Nearly 290,000 adults 18 years or older participated in the survey from 1997 through 2005. Eye care utilization was based on self-reported contact with an eye care professional in the past year. Participants were classified by level of visual impairment based on response to 2 questions. The survey and logistic regression procedures in SAS statistical software were used to compute 1997 through 2005 pooled eye care utilization rates and to identify correlates of utilization.

Results: Overall eye care utilization rates were 58.3%, 49.6%, and 33.7%, respectively, for participants with severe, some, and no visual impairment; rates for respondents without health insurance were 35.9%, 23.8%, and 14.3%, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analyses completed in racial/ethnic and age category subgroups indicated that no reported visual impairment, lack of health insurance, male sex, and low education were associated with low eye care utilization rates.

Conclusions: Interventions designed to increase eye care utilization rates in select sociodemographic subgroups are needed. Overall utilization rates may also be enhanced if progress is made toward dramatically increasing the number of Americans with health insurance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Prevent Blindness America. The economic impact of vision problems. http://www.preventblindness.org/research/Impact_of_Vision_Problems.pdf. Accessed October 12, 2007.
    1. Congdon N, O’Colmain B, Klaver CC, et al.; Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group. Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122(4):477–485. - PubMed
    1. Rowe S, MacLean CH, Shekelle PG. Preventing visual loss from chronic eye disease in primary care: scientific review. JAMA. 2004;291(12):1487–1495. - PubMed
    1. Sloan FA, Picone G, Brown DS, Lee PP. Longitudinal analysis of the relationship between regular eye examinations and changes in visual and functional status. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(11):1867–1874. - PubMed
    1. Paz SH, Varma R, Klein R, Wu J, Azen SP. Noncompliance with vision care guidelines in Latinos with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(8):1372–1377. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms