Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Mar;59(560):191-7.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X395003.

Primary health care in New Zealand: the impact of organisational factors on teamwork

Affiliations

Primary health care in New Zealand: the impact of organisational factors on teamwork

Sue Pullon et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2009 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Although teamwork is known to optimise good health care, organisational arrangements and funding models can foster, discourage, or preclude functional teamworking. Despite a new, enhanced population-based funding system for primary care in New Zealand, bringing new opportunities for more collaborative practice, fully implemented healthcare teamwork remains elusive.

Aim: To explore perceptions of interprofessional relationships, teamwork, and collaborative patient care in New Zealand primary care practice.

Design of study: Qualitative.

Setting: Eighteen nurses and doctors working in primary care, Wellington, New Zealand.

Method: Data were collected using in-depth interviews with individual nurses and doctors working in primary care settings. Perceptions of, and attitudes about, interprofessional relationships, teamwork, and collaborative patient care were explored, using an interactive process of content analysis and principles of naturalistic enquiry.

Results: Nurses and doctors working in New Zealand primary care perceive funding models that include fee-for-service, task-based components as strongly discouraging collaborative patient care. In contrast, teamwork was seen to be promoted when health services, not individual practitioners, were bulk-funded for capitated healthcare provision. In well-organised practices, where priority was placed on uninterrupted time for meetings, open communication, and interprofessional respect, good teamwork was more often observed. Salaried practices, where doctors and nurses alike were employees, were considered by some interviewees to be particularly supportive of good teamwork. Few interviewees had received, or knew of, any training to work in teams.

Conclusion: Health system, funding, and organisational factors still act as significant barriers to the successful implementation of, and training for, effective teamwork in New Zealand primary care settings, despite new opportunities for more collaborative ways of working.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Grumbach K, Bodenheimer K. Can health care teams improve primary care practice? JAMA. 2004;291(10):1246–1251. - PubMed
    1. Poulton B, West M. The determinants of effectiveness in primary health care teams. J Interprof Care. 1999;13(1):7–18.
    1. Sibbald B. Primary care: background and policy issues. In: Williamson A, editor. Nursing, medicine and primary care. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2000. pp. 14–26.
    1. Duckett S. Health workforce design for the 21st century. Aust Health Rev. 2005;29(2):201–210. - PubMed
    1. Williams G, Laungani P. Analysis of teamwork in an NHS community trust. J Interprof Care. 1999;13(1):19–28.

Publication types

MeSH terms