Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Feb 26;11(1):e7.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.988.

Integrating an eHealth program for pregnant women in midwifery care: a feasibility study among midwives and program users

Moniek van Zutphen  1 , Ivon E Milder, Wanda J Bemelmans
Affiliations

Integrating an eHealth program for pregnant women in midwifery care: a feasibility study among midwives and program users

Moniek van Zutphen et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Health messages may have the highest impact if they are given early in life. Therefore, the Dutch Ministry of Health identified pregnant women as a target population and initiated an innovative eHealth program to serve as a communication channel of health messages to pregnant women.

Objective: The aim was to study the feasibility of implementing this eHealth program into standard midwifery care and to investigate use and user perceptions of the online program among pregnant women.

Methods: All midwifery practices in Amsterdam affiliated with the Dutch Organization of Midwives (n = 25) were requested to implement the eHealth program within a pilot study from March to August 2006. Structured interviews were used to study feasibility of implementation among midwives. During the study period, 488 pregnant women registered themselves on the program website, after which monthly emails were sent to them. The emails were tailored to the stage of pregnancy and provided interactive questions plus answers on six topics and links to related websites. User statistics were registered until January 2007, and user perceptions were assessed with electronic questionnaires.

Results: In total, 80% (20/25) of midwifery practices implemented the program. These midwives gave a short oral explanation about the eHealth program to their clients (n = 1382; about 45% of the total number of clients during this period) and handed out an information brochure. After the pilot, 12 midwifery practices were willing to integrate the eHealth program into their standard care procedures. Regarding program usage, 84% (408/488) of the enrolled women accessed health information within the program. They opened 59% (1296/2213) of the quiz emails and accessed, on average, 16 topics (SD 11). Only 35% (143/408) of users used the hyperlinks to visit related websites. Most women perceived the eHealth information as easy to understand (96%; 157/163) and reliable (81%; 130/161), but only 39% (48/153) agreed that the information was available at the right time. Accessing more topics within the quiz emails was associated with a more positive perception of the program (P = .02), but the number of clicks to related websites was not associated with program perception (P = .32). The main improvement suggested by program users was to expand the information within the program.

Conclusions: It is feasible to integrate an innovative eHealth program in standard midwifery care, and about half of the practices would like to continue doing so. Program users accessed a substantial proportion of available health information; however, user perceptions were mixed. Therefore, this eHealth program may be a feasible communication channel to promote a healthy lifestyle to pregnant women after suggested revisions have been carried out.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screenshot of the quiz
Figure 2
Figure 2
User perceptions of the eHealth program (n = 163)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Szwajcer E M, Hiddink G J, Koelen M A, van Woerkum C M J. Nutrition-related information-seeking behaviours before and throughout the course of pregnancy: consequences for nutrition communication. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005 Aug;59 Suppl 1(S1):S57–65. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602175.1602175 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Larsson M. A descriptive study of the use of the Internet by women seeking pregnancy-related information. Midwifery. 2009;25(1):14–20. Epub 2007 Apr 3. - PubMed
    1. Bernhardt Jay M, Felter Elizabeth M. Online pediatric information seeking among mothers of young children: results from a qualitative study using focus groups. J Med Internet Res. 2004 Mar 1;6(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.1.e7. http://www.jmir.org/2004/1/e7/ - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Szwajcer Ellen M, Hiddink Gerrit J, Koelen Maria A, van Woerkum Cees M J. Nutrition awareness and pregnancy: implications for the life course perspective. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Nov;135(1):58–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.11.012.S0301-2115(06)00646-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anthony S, Amelink-Verburg MP, Jacobusse GW, van der Pal-de Bruin KM. De thuisbevalling in Nederland 1995-2002. Rapportage over de jaren 2001-2002, Stichting Perinatale Registratie Nederland / TNO Kwaliteit Van Leven. 2005. http://www.perinatreg.nl/uploads/153/99/Rapportage_Thuisbevalling_2001-2...

Publication types