Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Dec;2(3-4):69-76.
doi: 10.1007/s11568-009-9028-2. Epub 2009 Mar 11.

Disorders of the genome architecture: a review

Affiliations

Disorders of the genome architecture: a review

Dhavendra Kumar. Genomic Med. 2008 Dec.

Abstract

Genetic diseases are recognized to be one of the major categories of human disease. Traditionally genetic diseases are subdivided into chromosomal (numerical or structural aberrations), monogenic or Mendelian diseases, multifactorial/polygenic complex diseases and mitochondrial genetic disorders. A large proportion of these conditions occur sporadically. With the advent of newer molecular techniques, a number of new disorders and dysmorphic syndromes are delineated in detail. Some of these conditions do not conform to the conventional inheritance patterns and mechanisms are often complex and unique. Examples include submicroscopic microdeletions or microduplications, trinucleotide repeat disorders, epigenetic disorders due to genomic imprinting, defective transcription or translation due to abnormal RNA patterning and pathogenic association with single nucleotide polymorphisms and copy number variations. Among these several apparently monogenic disorders result from non-allelic homologous recombination associated with the presence of low copy number repeats on either side of the critical locus or gene cluster. The term 'disorders of genome architecture' is alternatively used to highlight these disorders, for example Charcot-Marie-Tooth type IA, Smith-Magenis syndrome, Neurofibromatosis type 1 and many more with an assigned OMIM number. Many of these so called genomic disorders occur sporadically resulting from largely non-recurrent de novo genomic rearrangements. Locus-specific mutation rates for genomic rearrangements appear to be two to four times greater than nucleotide-specific rates for base substitutions. Recent studies on several disease-associated recombination hotspots in male-germ cells indicate an excess of genomic rearrangements resulting in microduplications that are clinically underdiagnosed compared to microdeletion syndromes. Widespread application of high-resolution genome analyses may offer to detect more sporadic phenotypes resulting from genomic rearrangements involving de novo copy number variation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Molecular mechanisms for genomic disorders (Lupski and Stankiewicz 2005)—dashed lines indicate either deleted or duplicated region; the rearranged genomic interval is shown in brackets; gene is depicted by filled horizontal rectangle; regulatory gene is shown as horizontal hach-marked rectangle; asterisks denote point mutations
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Selected disorders of the genome architecture-Williams-Beuren syndrome (1); Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (2); Prader-Willi syndrome (3); Angelman syndrome (4); Smith-Magenis syndrome (5); CMTIA (6); Sotos syndrome (7);Neurofibromatosis-1 (8); 22q deletion syndrome (9,10)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mechanisms for non-allelic homologous recombination [NAHR] (Reproduced with permission from Nature Genetics, Turner et al. 2008)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The 1.5 Mb duplicated chromosomal region of 17p12 including the PMP22 gene—note 500 kb junction fragment allele flanking the CMT1A gene detected by PFGE and Southern analysis. Note additional 17p segment (red colour) by metaphase (top two pictures) and interphase (lower two pictures) FISH (Reproduced with permission from Oxford University Press, New York)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The unequal meiotic recombination (crossing-over) resulting in duplication [CMT1A] and deletion [HNPP]

References

    1. Bell JI. The double helix in clinical practice. Nature. 2003;421(6921):414–416. doi: 10.1038/nature01402. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blanco P, et al. Divergent outcomes of intrachromosomal recombination on the human Y chromosome male infertility and recurrent polymorphisms. J Med Genet. 2000;37:752–758. doi: 10.1136/jmg.37.10.752. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boch E, Jobling MA. Duplication of the AZFa region of the human Y chromosome are mediated by homolgous recombination between HERVs and are compatible with male fertility. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12:341–347. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddg031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cardon IR, Bell JI. Association study designs for complex diseases. Nat Rev Genet. 2001;2:91–99. doi: 10.1038/35052543. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chance PF, Abbas N, Lesch MW, et al. Two autosomal dominant neuropathies result from reciprocal DNA duplication/deletion of a region on chromosome 17. Hum Mol Genet. 1994;3:223–228. doi: 10.1093/hmg/3.2.223. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources