Review: use of electronic medical records for health outcomes research: a literature review
- PMID: 19279318
- DOI: 10.1177/1077558709332440
Review: use of electronic medical records for health outcomes research: a literature review
Abstract
This review assessed the use of electronic medical record (EMR) systems in outcomes research. We systematically searched PubMed to identify articles published from January 2000 to January 2007 involving EMR use for outpatient-based outcomes research in the United States. EMR-based outcomes research studies (n = 126) have increased sixfold since 2000. Although chronic conditions were most common, EMRs were also used to study less common diseases, highlighting the EMRs' flexibility to examine large cohorts as well as identify patients with rare diseases. Traditional multi-variate modeling techniques were the most commonly used technique to address confounding and potential selection bias. Data validation was a component in a quarter of studies, and many evaluated the EMR's ability to achieve similar results previously achieved using other data sources. Investigators using EMR data should aim for consistent terminology, focus on adequately describing their methods, and consider appropriate statistical methods to control for confounding and treatment-selection bias.
Similar articles
-
Application of electronic medical record data for health outcomes research: a review of recent literature.Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2013 Apr;13(2):191-200. doi: 10.1586/erp.13.7. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2013. PMID: 23570430 Review.
-
Asthma electronic medical records in primary care: an integrative review.J Asthma. 2010 Oct;47(8):895-912. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2010.4911411. J Asthma. 2010. PMID: 20854201 Review.
-
Using your electronic medical record for research: a primer for avoiding pitfalls.Fam Pract. 2010 Feb;27(1):121-6. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmp068. Epub 2009 Oct 14. Fam Pract. 2010. PMID: 19828572
-
Clinical research using an information system: the multicenter perioperative outcomes group.Anesthesiol Clin. 2011 Sep;29(3):377-88. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2011.06.002. Anesthesiol Clin. 2011. PMID: 21871400 Review.
-
Using electronic medical records to reduce errors and risks in a prenatal network.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;21(6):527-31. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328332d171. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19797949 Review.
Cited by
-
Developing Methods of Repurposing Electronic Health Record Data for Identification of Older Adults at Risk of Unintentional Falls.Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2016 Apr 1;13(Spring):1b. eCollection 2016. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2016. PMID: 27134607 Free PMC article.
-
Anonymization of longitudinal electronic medical records.IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2012 May;16(3):413-23. doi: 10.1109/TITB.2012.2185850. Epub 2012 Jan 27. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2012. PMID: 22287248 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-centered research from electronic medical records.Perm J. 2011 Fall;15(4):89-91. doi: 10.7812/tpp/11-138. Perm J. 2011. PMID: 22319426 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
A basic model for assessing primary health care electronic medical record data quality.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Feb 12;19(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0740-0. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019. PMID: 30755205 Free PMC article.
-
Bias in recording of body mass index data in the electronic health record.AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2013 Mar 18;2013:214-8. eCollection 2013. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2013. PMID: 24303267 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources