Static frictional force and surface roughness of nickel-titanium arch wires
- PMID: 1927985
- DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(91)70072-5
Static frictional force and surface roughness of nickel-titanium arch wires
Abstract
Surface roughness and static frictional force resistance of orthodontic arch wires were measured. Nine nickel-titanium alloy arch wires were studied. One beta-titanium alloy wire, one stainless steel alloy wire, and one cobalt-chromium alloy wire were included for comparison. Arithmetic average roughness in micrometers was measured with a profilometer. Frictional force resistance was quantified by pushing wire segments through the stainless steel self-ligating brackets of a four-tooth clinical model. The cobalt-chromium alloy and the nickel-titanium alloy wires, with the exception of Sentalloy and Orthonol, exhibited the lowest frictional resistance. The stainless steel alloy and the beta-titanium alloy wires showed the highest frictional resistance. The stainless steel alloy wire was the smoothest wire tested, whereas NiTi, Marsenol, and Orthonol were the roughest. No significant correlation was found between arithmetic average roughness and frictional force values.
Similar articles
-
Static frictional force and surface roughness of various bracket and wire combinations.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Jan;139(1):74-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.02.031. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011. PMID: 21195280
-
Relative kinetic frictional forces between sintered stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Jan;107(1):20-7. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70153-2. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995. PMID: 7817958
-
Evaluation of friction between edgewise stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Aug;98(2):117-26. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(90)70005-W. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990. PMID: 2378317
-
Coefficients of friction for arch wires in stainless steel and polycrystalline alumina bracket slots. I. The dry state.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Oct;98(4):300-12. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81487-8. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990. PMID: 2220691 Review.
-
[Currently used orthodontic alloys. Review (1)].Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo. 1990 Oct-Dec;4(4):334-42. Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo. 1990. PMID: 2135450 Review. Portuguese.
Cited by
-
Variations in surface roughness of seven orthodontic archwires: an SEM-profilometry study.Korean J Orthod. 2012 Jun;42(3):129-37. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2012.42.3.129. Epub 2012 Jun 28. Korean J Orthod. 2012. PMID: 23112943 Free PMC article.
-
An in vitro comparative evaluation of surface roughness characteristics of different orthodontic archwires: An atomic force microscopy study.J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2022 Spring;16(2):91-94. doi: 10.34172/joddd.2022.015. Epub 2022 Oct 15. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2022. PMID: 36561385 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of chlorhexidine-containing prophylactic agent on the surface characterization and frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwires: an in vitro study.Prog Orthod. 2013 Nov 20;14(1):48. doi: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-48. Prog Orthod. 2013. PMID: 24325758 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the Effect of Different Types of Fluoride on Tensile Properties and Surface Roughness of Different Titanium-Based Archwires: An In vivo Study.J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Nov;13(Suppl 2):S1193-S1198. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_341_21. Epub 2021 Nov 10. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021. PMID: 35017955 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of surface topography of low-friction and conventional TMA orthodontic arch wires using atomic force microscopy.J Orthod Sci. 2021 Feb 19;10:2. doi: 10.4103/jos.JOS_27_20. eCollection 2021. J Orthod Sci. 2021. PMID: 34084758 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources