[Current status of dacryocystorhinostomy]
- PMID: 19280198
- DOI: 10.1007/s00347-008-1904-y
[Current status of dacryocystorhinostomy]
Abstract
The history of the treatment of lacrimal duct stenosis dates back to the ancient world. Modern lacrimal duct surgery began with the description of external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) by Toti and the endonasal procedure by West. Modifications include construction of a mucous membrane flap and the use of different instruments such as microscopes, endoscopes, and laser. This article reviews the various methods currently in use, although the analysis makes clear how difficult it is to compare studies. Because of the high success rate and the possibility of correcting multiple disturbing factors of the lacrimal drainage system, external DCR remains the gold standard for the ophthalmologist; other methods must be measured by the success rate of external DCR. The future of lacrimal duct surgery lies in a better understanding of wound healing and thus the possibility for precise modulation. Better results may be possible by combining different surgical methods. Prospective studies are urgently necessary.
Similar articles
-
[Treatment of lacrimal stenosis. Causes, diagnostics, and surgical procedures].Ophthalmologe. 2009 Mar;106(3):217-22. doi: 10.1007/s00347-008-1905-x. Ophthalmologe. 2009. PMID: 19259688 Review. German.
-
MRI evaluation of lacrimal drainage after external and endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Jul-Aug;25(4):289-92. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181ac5320. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009. PMID: 19617787 Clinical Trial.
-
[Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with transillumination of the lacrimal sac: implementation and results].Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1994 May;204(5):394-7. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1994. PMID: 8051880 German.
-
Comparison of endoscopic revision for failed primary external versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Mar;41(2):116-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02844.x. Epub 2012 Sep 17. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013. PMID: 22788548
-
Clinically suspected primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: clinicopathologic review of 150 patients.Ophthalmology. 1997 Nov;104(11):1882-6. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30012-8. Ophthalmology. 1997. PMID: 9373121 Review.
Cited by
-
Modern lacrimal duct surgery from the ophthalmological perspective.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010 Apr;107(14):254-8. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0254. Epub 2010 Apr 9. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010. PMID: 20436778 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Intrasaccal foreign body after lacrimal duct surgery-A relic from the past?].Ophthalmologie. 2025 Jul;122(7):544-547. doi: 10.1007/s00347-025-02211-z. Epub 2025 Mar 19. Ophthalmologie. 2025. PMID: 40105967 German. No abstract available.
-
[Microendoscopic minimally invasive techniques in lacrimal surgery].Ophthalmologe. 2017 May;114(5):409-415. doi: 10.1007/s00347-017-0481-3. Ophthalmologe. 2017. PMID: 28378046 Review. German.
-
[Dacryocystorhinostomy as part of the interdisciplinary treatment of lacrimal duct].HNO. 2013 Oct;61(10):851-8. doi: 10.1007/s00106-013-2672-9. HNO. 2013. PMID: 23483245 Clinical Trial. German.
-
[Modern, minimally invasive surgery of the lacrimal duct system].Ophthalmologe. 2014 Sep;111(9):887-95; quiz 896. doi: 10.1007/s00347-014-3131-z. Ophthalmologe. 2014. PMID: 25164116 German.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources