Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1991 Nov;49(5):985-94.

Influence of aberrant observations on high-resolution linkage analysis outcomes

Affiliations

Influence of aberrant observations on high-resolution linkage analysis outcomes

K H Buetow. Am J Hum Genet. 1991 Nov.

Abstract

Because of the availability of efficient, user-friendly computer analysis programs, the construction of multilocus human genetic maps has become commonplace. At the level of resolution at which most of these maps have been developed, the methods have proved to be robust. This may not be true in the construction of high-resolution linkage maps (3-cM interlocus resolution or less). High-resolution meiotic maps, by definition, have a low probability of recombination occurring in an interval. As such, even low frequencies of errors in typing (1.5% or less) may influence mapping outcomes. To investigate the influence of aberrant observations on high-resolution maps, a Monte Carlo simulation analysis of multipoint linkage data was performed. Introduction of error was observed to reduce power to discriminate orders, dramatically inflate map length, and provide significant support for incorrect over correct orders. These results appear to be due to the misclassification of nonrecombinant gametes as multiple recombinants. Chi 2-Like goodness-of-fit analysis appears to be quite sensitive to the appearance of misclassified gametes, providing a simple test for aberrant data sets. Multiple pairwise likelihood analysis appears to be less sensitive than does multipoint analysis and may serve as a check for map validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Science. 1989 Sep 8;245(4922):1073-80 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1989 Mar 2;338(6210):35-9 - PubMed
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1989 Mar;44(3):388-96 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1986 Oct 16-22;323(6089):643-6 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jun;81(11):3443-6 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources