Soft tissues healing at immediate transmucosal implants placed into molar extraction sites with buccal self-contained dehiscences. A 12-month controlled clinical trial
- PMID: 19281503
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01688.x
Soft tissues healing at immediate transmucosal implants placed into molar extraction sites with buccal self-contained dehiscences. A 12-month controlled clinical trial
Abstract
Aim: To assess soft tissues healing at immediate transmucosal implants placed into molar extraction sites with buccal self-contained dehiscences.
Material and methods: For this 12-month controlled clinical trial, 15 subjects received immediate transmucosal tapered-effect (TE) implants placed in molar extraction sockets displaying a buccal bone dehiscence (test sites) with a height and a width of > or =3 mm, respectively. Peri-implant marginal defects were treated according to the principles of Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) by means of deproteinized bovine bone mineral particles in conjunction with a bioresorbable collagen membrane. Fifteen subjects received implants in healed molar sites (control sites) with intact buccal alveolar walls following tooth extraction. In total, 30 TE implants with an endosseous diameter of 4.8 mm and a shoulder diameter of 6.5 mm were used. Flaps were repositioned and sutured, allowing non-submerged, transmucosal soft tissues healing. At the 12-month follow-up, pocket probing depths (PPD) and clinical attachment levels (CAL) were compared between implants placed in the test and the control sites, respectively.
Results: All subjects completed the 12-month follow-up period. All implants healed uneventfully, yielding a survival rate of 100%. After 12 months, statistically significantly higher (P<0.05) PPD and CAL values were recorded around implants placed in the test sites compared with those placed in the control sites.
Conclusions: The findings of this controlled clinical trial showed that healing following immediate transmucosal implant installation in molar extraction sites with wide and shallow buccal dehiscences yielded less favorable outcomes compared with those of implants placed in healed sites, and resulted in lack of 'complete' osseointegration.
Similar articles
-
Dimensional ridge alterations following immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a six-month prospective cohort study with surgical re-entry.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Oct;20(10):1092-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01803.x. Epub 2009 Aug 30. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009. PMID: 19719737
-
Immediate transmucosal implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 12-month prospective multicenter cohort study.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 May;19(5):476-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01541.x. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008. PMID: 18416726
-
Immediate implant placement with transmucosal healing in areas of aesthetic priority. A multicentre randomized-controlled clinical trial I. Surgical outcomes.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Apr;18(2):188-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01371.x. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007. PMID: 17348883 Clinical Trial.
-
Immediate or early placement of implants following tooth extraction: review of biologic basis, clinical procedures, and outcomes.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:12-25. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004. PMID: 15635942 Review.
-
How does the timing of implant placement to extraction affect outcome?Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22 Suppl:203-23. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007. PMID: 18437797 Review.
Cited by
-
Bone substitutes for peri-implant defects of postextraction implants.Int J Biomater. 2013;2013:307136. doi: 10.1155/2013/307136. Epub 2013 Dec 12. Int J Biomater. 2013. PMID: 24454377 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sockets: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Implant Dent. 2020 Oct 13;6(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00235-5. Int J Implant Dent. 2020. PMID: 32770283 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Single-blind randomized clinical trial to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes after one year of immediate versus delayed implant placement supporting full-arch prostheses.Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014 May 1;19(3):e295-301. doi: 10.4317/medoral.19536. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014. PMID: 24316712 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A clinical and radiographical comparison of buccolingual crestal bone changes after immediate and delayed implant placement.Med Pharm Rep. 2019 Oct;92(4):401-407. doi: 10.15386/mpr-1213. Epub 2019 Oct 25. Med Pharm Rep. 2019. PMID: 31750442 Free PMC article.
-
The 10 Year Outcomes of Implants Inserted with Dehiscence or Fenestrations in the Rehabilitation of Completely Edentulous Jaws with the All-on-4 Concept.J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 31;11(7):1939. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071939. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35407547 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources