Dating and growth in the first trimester
- PMID: 19282247
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.01.011
Dating and growth in the first trimester
Abstract
Measurement of embryonic or foetal size using the greatest length of the embryo or foetal crown rump length can be used to accurately determine the gestational age of a normal first trimester pregnancy to within three to five days. Transvaginal ultrasound scan can be used to measure the size of an embryo and gestation sac earlier than transabdominal ultrasound. The original Robinson curve used for dating pregnancies is still valid in most cases. Ultrasound dating in the first trimester is now recommended for all women with spontaneous pregnancies, even those with certain menstrual dates. First trimester growth in normal pregnancy is not uniform and is influenced by both maternal and foetal factors. Early foetal growth restriction is demonstrated in many pregnancies that subsequently end in first trimester miscarriage and is also demonstrated in fetuses with triploidy, trisomy 18 and possibly trisomy 13. Pregnancies which are small at the 11-14 week ultrasound scan appear to be at risk of later intrauterine growth restriction, preeclampsia and preterm delivery. Cross-sectional and serial measurement of foetal growth in the first trimester may be helpful in predicting both miscarriage and adverse late pregnancy outcomes.
Similar articles
-
First-trimester ultrasound dating of twin pregnancy: are singleton charts reliable?BJOG. 2010 Jul;117(8):979-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02592.x. Epub 2010 May 19. BJOG. 2010. PMID: 20482534
-
New crown-rump length curve based on over 3500 pregnancies.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jun;35(6):650-5. doi: 10.1002/uog.7654. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010. PMID: 20512816
-
Ultrasound dating at 12-14 weeks of gestation. A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in in-vitro fertilized pregnancies.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Oct;26(5):504-11. doi: 10.1002/uog.1993. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005. PMID: 16149101
-
Should a first trimester dating scan be routine for all pregnancies?Semin Perinatol. 2013 Oct;37(5):307-9. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2013.06.006. Semin Perinatol. 2013. PMID: 24176152 Review.
-
Biometric assessment.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Dec;23(6):819-31. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.06.007. Epub 2009 Jul 26. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009. PMID: 19632901 Review.
Cited by
-
Correction of systematic bias in ultrasound dating in studies of small-for-gestational-age birth: an example from the Iowa Health in Pregnancy Study.Am J Epidemiol. 2012 Sep 1;176(5):443-55. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws120. Epub 2012 Aug 10. Am J Epidemiol. 2012. PMID: 22886591 Free PMC article.
-
Head circumference and height abnormalities in autism revisited: the role of pre- and perinatal risk factors.Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;22(1):35-43. doi: 10.1007/s00787-012-0318-1. Epub 2012 Aug 26. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013. PMID: 22923066
-
A logistic model to predict early pregnancy loss following in vitro fertilization based on 2601 infertility patients.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2016 Mar 31;14:15. doi: 10.1186/s12958-016-0147-z. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2016. PMID: 27036944 Free PMC article.
-
An analytical cross-sectional study: determining gestational age using fetal clavicle length during the second trimester.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Jun;309(6):2663-2668. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07196-1. Epub 2023 Sep 1. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024. PMID: 37653252
-
Discrepancy between pregnancy dating methods affects obstetric and neonatal outcomes: a population-based register cohort study.Sci Rep. 2018 May 2;8(1):6936. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24894-y. Sci Rep. 2018. PMID: 29720591 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical