Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008:2008:839503.
doi: 10.1155/2008/839503. Epub 2009 Mar 11.

Controversies in the management of borderline resectable proximal pancreatic adenocarcinoma with vascular involvement

Affiliations

Controversies in the management of borderline resectable proximal pancreatic adenocarcinoma with vascular involvement

Olga N Tucker et al. HPB Surg. 2008.

Abstract

Synchronous major vessel resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains controversial. In the 1970s, regional pancreatectomy advocated by Fortner was associated with unacceptably high morbidity and mortality rates, with no impact on long-term survival. With the establishment of a multidisciplinary approach, improvements in preoperative staging techniques, surgical expertise, and perioperative care reduced mortality rates and improved 5-year-survival rates are now achieved following resection in high-volume centres. Perioperative morbidity and mortality following PD with portal vein resection are comparable to standard PD, with reported 5-year-survival rates of up to 17%. Segmental resection and reconstruction of the common hepatic artery/proper hepatic artery (CHA/PHA) can be performed to achieve an R0 resection in selected patients with limited involvement of the CHA/PHA at the origin of the gastroduodenal artery (GDA). PD with concomitant major vessel resection for borderline resectable tumours should be performed when a margin-negative resection is anticipated at high-volume centres with expertise in complex pancreatic surgery. Where an incomplete (R1 or R2) resection is likely neoadjuvant treatment with systemic chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation as part of a clinical trial should be offered to all patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Matsuno S, Egawa S, Fukuyama S, et al. Pancreatic cancer registry in Japan: 20 years of experience. Pancreas. 2004;28(3):219–230. - PubMed
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma—v.1. 2008. Nov,
    1. Varadhachary GR, Tamm EP, Abbruzzese JL, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: definitions, management, and role of preoperative therapy. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2006;13(8):1035–1046. - PubMed
    1. Fuhrman GM, Charnsangavej C, Abbruzzese JL, et al. Thin-section contrast-enhanced computed tomography accurately predicts the resectability of malignant pancreatic neoplasms. The American Journal of Surgery. 1994;167(1):104–113. - PubMed
    1. Talamonti M. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a new classification for an old challenge. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2006;13(8):1019–1020. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources