Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Mar;10(3):219-29.
doi: 10.1631/jzus.B0820273.

Colorectal cancer, one entity or three

Affiliations
Review

Colorectal cancer, one entity or three

Feng-ying Li et al. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2009 Mar.

Abstract

Understanding of the mechanism of colorectal carcinogenesis has been gaining momentum for some years on account of its high incidence and impact on the lives of individuals affected. Different genetic abnormalities have been found in colorectal cancers from different sites. For example, proximal colon cancer is usually related to the nucleotide instability pathway, as microsatellite instability (MSI). However, distal colon cancer is usually associated with specific chromosomal instability (CIN). The development of cancer at the rectum, though similar to that at the colon, displays its own unique features. These differences might be partially attributed to different embryological development and physiological circumstances. Environmental factors such as diet and alcohol intake also differ in their role in the development of tumors in the three segments, proximal colon, distal colon, and rectum. "Proximal shift" of colon cancer has been known for some time, and survival rates of colorectal cancer are higher when rectal cancers are excluded, both of which emphasize the three different segments of colorectal cancer and their different properties. Meanwhile, colonic and rectal cancers are distinctive therapeutic entities. The concept of three entities of colorectal cancer may be important in designing clinical trails or therapeutic strategies. However, the dispute about the inconsistency of data concerning the site-specific mechanism of colorectal carcinoma does exist, and more evidence about molecular events of carcinogenesis and targeted therapy needs to be collected to definitely confirm the conception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Three segments of colorectum: right-sided tumours are classified as originating proximal to the splenic flexure (cecum, ascending colon, and transverse colon); left-sided tumors arise distally to this site (descending colon, sigmoid colon) and rectum

References

    1. Aaltonen LA, Salovaara R, Kristo P, Canzian F, Hemminki A, Peltomaki P, Chadwick RB, Kaariainen H, Eskelinen M, Jarvinen H, et al. Incidence of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and the feasibility of molecular screening for the disease. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(21):1481–1487. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199805213382101. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adam IJ, Mohamdee MO, Martin IG, Scott N, Finan PJ, Johnston D, Dixon MF, Quirke P. Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Lancet. 1994;344(8924):707–711. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)92206-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. AHCPR (Agency for Health Care Policy and Research) Colorectal Cancer Screening. Technical Review 1. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1998. AHCPR Publication No. 98-0033. - PubMed
    1. Anacleto C, Leopoldino AM, Rossi B, Soares FA, Lopes A, Rocha JC, Caballero O, Camargo AA, Simpson AJ, Pena SD. Colorectal cancer “methylator phenotype”: fact or artifact? Neoplasia. 2005;7(4):331–335. doi: 10.1593/neo.04502. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arai T, Kino I. Morphometrical and cell kinetic studies of normal human colorectal mucosa. Comparison between the proximal and the distal large intestine. Acta Pathol Jpn. 1989;39(11):725–730. - PubMed

Publication types