Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Jan 30:1:5.
doi: 10.1186/1758-3284-1-5.

Diagnostic aids in the screening of oral cancer

Affiliations
Review

Diagnostic aids in the screening of oral cancer

Stefano Fedele. Head Neck Oncol. .

Abstract

The World Health Organization has clearly identified prevention and early detection as major objectives in the control of the oral cancer burden worldwide. At the present time, screening of oral cancer and its pre-invasive intra-epithelial stages, as well as its early detection, is still largely based on visual examination of the mouth. There is strong available evidence to suggest that visual inspection of the oral mucosa is effective in reducing mortality from oral cancer in individuals exposed to risk factors. Simple visual examination, however, is well known to be limited by subjective interpretation and by the potential, albeit rare, occurrence of dysplasia and early OSCC within areas of normal-looking oral mucosa. As a consequence, adjunctive techniques have been suggested to increase our ability to differentiate between benign abnormalities and dysplastic/malignant changes as well as to identify areas of dysplasia/early OSCC that are not visible to naked eye. These include the use of toluidine blue, brush biopsy, chemiluminescence and tissue autofluorescence. The present paper reviews the evidence supporting the efficacy of the aforementioned techniques in improving the identification of dysplastic/malignant changes of the oral mucosa. We conclude that available studies have shown promising results, but strong evidence to support the use of oral cancer diagnostic aids is still lacking. Further research with clear objectives, well-defined population cohorts, and sound methodology is strongly required.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer – World Health Organization The GLOBOCAN 2002 database http://www-dep.iarc.fr/
    1. Mignogna MD, Fedele S, Lo Russo L. The World Cancer Report and the burden of oral cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2004;13:139–142. doi: 10.1097/00008469-200404000-00008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gloeckler Ries LA, Kosary CL, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Harras A, Edwards BK, eds . NIH publication no 97-2789. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, US; 1997. SEER cancer statistics review, 1973–1994.http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1973_1994/
    1. Mignogna MD, Fedele S, Lo Russo L, Ruoppo E, Lo Muzio L. Costs and effectiveness in the care of patients with oral and pharyngeal cancer: analysis of a paradox. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2002;11:205–208. doi: 10.1097/00008469-200206000-00002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mashberg A. Diagnosis of early oral and oropharyngeal squamous carcinoma: obstacles and their amelioration. Oral Oncol. 2000;36:253–255. doi: 10.1016/S1368-8375(00)00006-3. - DOI - PubMed

Substances