Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2009 May 1;27(13):2253-60.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.4408. Epub 2009 Mar 16.

Randomized phase II study of gefitinib compared with placebo in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and poor performance status

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Randomized phase II study of gefitinib compared with placebo in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and poor performance status

Glenwood Goss et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: To compare gefitinib with placebo in chemotherapy naïve patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and poor performance status.

Patients and methods: NSCLC patients (chemotherapy naïve, WHO performance status 2 or 3; unfit for chemotherapy; stage IIIB/IV) were randomly assigned to gefitinib (250 mg/d) plus best supportive care (BSC; n = 100) or placebo plus BSC (n = 101). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), quality of life (QOL), pulmonary symptom improvement (PSI), and safety. Correlation of gefitinib efficacy with EGFR gene copy number (fluorescent in situ hybridization [FISH]) was explored.

Results: Hazard ratios (HRs; gefitinib:placebo) were 0.82 (95% CI, 0.60 to 1.12; P = .217) for PFS and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.62 to 1.15; P = .272) for OS. As expected for this patient population, OS for both arms was poor, at about 3 months. ORRs were 6.0% (gefitinib) and 1.0% (placebo). QOL and PSI rates were 21.1% and 28.3% (gefitinib) and 20.0% and 28.3% (placebo), respectively. In EGFR FISH-positive patients (n = 32), HRs were 0.29 (95% CI, 0.11 to 0.73) for PFS and 0.44 (95% CI, 0.17 to 1.12) for OS. No unexpected adverse events occurred.

Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference in PFS, OS, and ORRs after treatment with gefitinib or placebo, in the overall population; improvements in QOL and symptoms were similar in both groups. Tolerability profile of gefitinib was consistent with previous studies. PFS was statistically significantly improved for gefitinib-treated patients with EGFR FISH-positive tumors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Patient disposition.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Kaplan-Meier curves for (A) progression-free survival and (B) overall survival. HR, hazard ratio.
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
Improvement rates for quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Lung [FACT-L] total score and trial outcome index [TOI]) and symptom improvement (Lung Cancer Subscale [LCS] and pulmonary symptom improvement [PSI]). OR, odds ratio.
Fig 4.
Fig 4.
Kaplan-Meier curves for (A) progression-free survival and (B) overall survival by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) status (exploratory analyses). HR, hazard ratio.

References

    1. Buccheri G, Ferrigno D, Tamburini M. Karnofsky and ECOG performance status scoring in lung cancer: A prospective, longitudinal study of 536 patients from a single institution. Eur J Cancer. 1996;32A:1135–1141. - PubMed
    1. Jiroutek M, Johnson D, Blum R, et al. Prognostic factors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Analysis of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) trials from 1981-1992. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 1998;18:461a. abstr 1774.
    1. Jeremic B, Milicic B, Dagovic A, et al. Pretreatment clinical prognostic factors in patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with chemotherapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2003;129:114–122. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lilenbaum RC, Herndon JE, List MA, et al. Single-agent versus combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: The cancer and leukemia group B (study 9730) J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:190–196. - PubMed
    1. Perrone F, Di Maio M, Gallo C, et al. Outcome of patients with a performance status of 2 in the Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study (MILES) J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:5018–5020. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms