Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Controlled Clinical Trial
. 2009 Feb;6(1):39-46.
doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2008.00564.x.

Maggot debridement therapy with Lucilia cuprina: a comparison with conventional debridement in diabetic foot ulcers

Aaron G Paul  1 , Nazni W Ahmad, H L Lee, Ashraff M Ariff, Masri Saranum, Amara S Naicker, Zulkiflee Osman
Affiliations
Controlled Clinical Trial

Maggot debridement therapy with Lucilia cuprina: a comparison with conventional debridement in diabetic foot ulcers

Aaron G Paul et al. Int Wound J. 2009 Feb.

Abstract

This is prospective case-control study of more than 18 months performed to assess the effectiveness of maggot debridement therapy (MDT) with the sterile larvae of Lucilia cuprina (a tropical blowfly maggot) for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Literature thus far has only reported results with the temperate maggot, Lucilia sericata. This study documents outcome in diabetic foot wounds treated with maggot debridement versus those treated by conventional debridement alone. In this series of 29 patients treated with MDT, 14 wounds were healed, 11 were unhealed and 4 were classified under others. The control group treated by conventional debridement had 30 patients of which 18 wounds were healed, 11 unhealed and 1 classified under others. There was no significant difference in outcome between the two groups. The conclusion that can be made from this study is that MDT with L. cuprina is as effective as conventional debridement in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. It would be a feasible alternative to those at high risk for surgery or for those who refuse surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Rajoo R. Diabetic foot ulcer treatment with maggot debridement therapy. Report from the Orthopaedics Department of the Lumut Armed Forces Hospital, Malaysia, 2004.
    1. Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Harkless LB. Validation of a diabetic wound classification system: the contribution of depth infection and ischemica to risk of amputation. Diabates Care 1998;21:855–9. - PubMed
    1. Sherman RA, Wyle F, Vulpe M. Maggot debridement therapy for treating pressure ulcers in spinal cord injury patients. J Spinal Cord Med 1995;18:71–4. - PubMed
    1. Sherman RA. Maggot vs conservative debridement therapy for the treatment of pressure ulcers. Wound Repair Regen 2002;10:208–14. - PubMed
    1. Namias N, Varela E, Varas RP, Quintana O, Ward CG. Biodebridement: a case report of maggot therapy for limb salvage after fourth‐degree burns. J Burn Care Rehabil 2000;21:254–7. - PubMed

Publication types