Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009;10(3):213.
doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-213. Epub 2009 Mar 6.

Rac and Rho driving tumor invasion: who's at the wheel?

Affiliations
Review

Rac and Rho driving tumor invasion: who's at the wheel?

Marc Symons et al. Genome Biol. 2009.

Abstract

Genome-wide analysis of regulators of Rho-family small GTPases has identified critical elements that control the morphology and invasive behavior of melanoma cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Characteristics of the mesenchymal and amoeboid cell phenotypes.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Signaling control of mesenchymal and amoeboid cell phenotypes. The reciprocal inhibitory relationship between Rac and Rho signaling cascades establishes a bistable switch that controls the mesenchymal and amoeboid phenotypes. Mesenchymal morphology is controlled by a pathway that activates Rac1 via the adaptor protein NEDD9 and the Rac-specific GEF DOCK3. Rac1 activation results in actin polymerization mediated by the actin-nucleation protein WAVE2, which promotes cell elongation. WAVE2 somehow also suppresses actomyosin contractility and, consequently, amoeboid behavior. On the other hand, Rho/ROCK activation stimulates actomysoin contractility, thereby promoting the amoeboid phenotype, and inhibits Rac by activating the Rac-specific GAP, ARHGAP22. Presumably both Rac1 and Rho activation are ultimately controlled by integrin activity, but precisely how the extracellular environment favors either Rac or Rho signaling remains to be resolved. Solid arrows, direct connections; dashed arrows, indirect connections.

References

    1. Martin MD, Matrisian LM. The other side of MMPs: protective roles in tumor progression. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2007;26:717–724. doi: 10.1007/s10555-007-9089-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Overall CM, Kleifeld O. Towards third generation matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors for cancer therapy. Br J Cancer. 2006;94:941–946. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603043. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pavlaki M, Zucker S. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors (MMPIs): the beginning of phase I or the termination of phase III clinical trials. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2003;22:177–203. doi: 10.1023/A:1023047431869. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wolf K, Mazo I, Leung H, Engelke K, von Andrian UH, Deryugina EI, Strongin AY, Brocker EB, Friedl P. Compensation mechanism in tumor cell migration: mesenchymalamoeboid transition after blocking of pericellular proteolysis. J Cell Biol. 2003;160:267–277. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200209006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wolf K, Friedl P. Molecular mechanisms of cancer cell invasion and plasticity. Br J Dermatol. 2006;154(Suppl 1):11–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07231.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources