Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Apr 7;100(7):1198-204.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604973. Epub 2009 Mar 17.

Mean sojourn time, overdiagnosis, and reduction in advanced stage prostate cancer due to screening with PSA: implications of sojourn time on screening

Affiliations

Mean sojourn time, overdiagnosis, and reduction in advanced stage prostate cancer due to screening with PSA: implications of sojourn time on screening

N Pashayan et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the mean sojourn time (MST) of prostate cancer, to estimate the probability of overdiagnosis, and to predict the potential reduction in advanced stage disease due to screening with PSA. The MST of prostate cancer was derived from detection rates at PSA prevalence testing in 43,842 men, aged 50-69 years, as part of the ProtecT study, from the incidence of non-screen-detected cases obtained from the English population-based cancer registry database, and from PSA sensitivity obtained from the medical literature. The relative reduction in advanced stage disease was derived from the expected and observed incidences of advanced stage prostate cancer. The age-specific MST for men aged 50-59 and 60-69 years were 11.3 and 12.6 years, respectively. Overdiagnosis estimates increased with age; 10-31% of the PSA-detected cases were estimated to be overdiagnosed. An interscreening interval of 2 years was predicted to result in 37 and 63% reduction in advanced stage disease in men 65-69 and 50-54 years, respectively. If the overdiagnosed cases were excluded, the estimated reductions were 9 and 54%, respectively. Thus, the benefit of screening in reducing advanced stage disease is limited by overdiagnosis, which is greater in older men.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Andriole GL, Levin DL, Crawford ED, Gelmann EP, Pinsky PF, Chia D, Kramer BS, Reding D, Church TR, Grubb RL, Izmirlian G, Ragard LR, Clapp JD, Prorok PC, Gohagan JK (2005) Prostate Cancer Screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial: findings from the initial screening round of a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(6): 433–438 - PubMed
    1. Auvinen A, Maattanen L, Stenman UH, Tammela T, Rannikko S, Aro J, Juusela H, Hakama M (2002) Lead-time in prostate cancer screening (Finland). Cancer Causes Control 13(3): 279–285 - PubMed
    1. Brett TD (1998) An analysis of digital rectal examination and serum-prostate-specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer in general practice. Fam Pract 15(6): 529–533 - PubMed
    1. Bretton PR (1994) Prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination in screening for prostate cancer: a community-based study. South Med J 87(7): 720–723 - PubMed
    1. Day NE, Williams DR, Khaw KT (1989) Breast cancer screening programmes: the development of a monitoring and evaluation system. Br J Cancer 59(6): 954–958 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances