Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Jul;14(3):356-65.
doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2009.00149.x. Epub 2009 Mar 5.

Do genetic and individual risk factors moderate the efficacy of motivational enhancement therapy? Drinking outcomes with an emerging adult sample

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Do genetic and individual risk factors moderate the efficacy of motivational enhancement therapy? Drinking outcomes with an emerging adult sample

Sarah W Feldstein Ewing et al. Addict Biol. 2009 Jul.

Abstract

Research indicates that motivational enhancement therapy (MET) helps catalyze reductions in problem drinking among emerging adults. However, moderators of this intervention remain relatively unknown. Therefore, the objectives of this study were: (1) to test whether a single session of MET increased motivation to reduce drinking and drinking outcomes; and (2) to examine whether genetic dopamine D(4) receptor L (DRD4 L) and individual personality risk factors (impulsivity and novelty seeking) moderated the effects of the MET. These hypotheses were evaluated by randomly assigning a sample of emerging adult problem drinkers (n = 67) to receive a single session of MET or alcohol education. Follow-up data indicated that only individuals who were low in impulsivity, novelty seeking and/or who had the short DRD4 variable number of tandem repeats genotype evidenced differentially increased behavior change (taking steps toward reducing drinking) following the MET.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intervention effects by DRD4 VNTR genotype in the alcohol education (AE) control and motivational enhancement therapy (MET) conditions. (a) DRD4 S individuals. (b) DRD4 L individuals
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intervention effects by level of impulsivity/sensation-seeking in the alcohol education (AE) control and motivational enhancement therapy (MET) conditions. (a) Low impulsivity/ sensation seeking. (b) High impulsivity/sensation seeking

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anton RF, Oroszi G, O’Malley S, Couper D, Swift R, Pettinati H, Goldman D. An evaluation of mu-opioid receptor (oprm1) as a predictor of naltrexone response in the treatment of Alcohol Dependence: results from the Combined Pharmacotherapies and Behavioral Interventions for Alcohol Dependence (COMBINE) study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65:135–144. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC, Sanders JB, Montero MG. Audit: The alcohol use disorders identification test: Guidelines for use in primary care (The World Health Organization) 2006.
    1. Baer JS, Garrett SB, Beadnell B, Wells EA, Peterson P. Brief motivational intervention with homeless adolescents: evaluating effects on substance use and service utilization. Psychol Addict Behav. 2007;21:582–586. - PubMed
    1. Baer JS, Kivlahan DR, Blume AW, McKnight P, Marlatt GA. Brief intervention for heavy drinking college students: 4-year follow up and natural history. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:1310–1316. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baer JS, Marlatt GA, Kivlahan DR, Fromme K, Larimer ME, Williams E. An experimental test of three methods of alcohol risk reduction with young adults. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1992;60:974–979. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms