Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Apr;249(4):583-7.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819ec809.

Randomized, controlled, prospective trial of the use of a mesh to prevent parastomal hernia

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized, controlled, prospective trial of the use of a mesh to prevent parastomal hernia

Xavier Serra-Aracil et al. Ann Surg. 2009 Apr.

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of terminal parastomal hernia (PH) after colostomy placement may be as high as 50%. The effect of the PH may range from discomfort to life-threatening complications. Surgical procedures for repairing PH are difficult to perform and present a high-failure rate.

Objective: To reduce the incidence of PH by implanting a lightweight mesh in the sublay position.

Material and methods: Randomized, controlled, prospective study. Patients were scheduled for permanent end colostomy surgery to treat cancer of the lower third of the rectum, performed by the same colorectal surgery team. An Ultrapro lightweight mesh was inserted in the sublay position in the study group. Using simple randomization, the sample size required was estimated to be 27 per group. Patients were followed-up clinically and radiologically with abdominal computed tomography by an independent clinician and a radiologist who were all blind to the aims of the study, 1 month and every 6 months after surgery.

Results: : The groups were homogeneous in terms of their clinical and demographic characteristics. Surgical time and postoperative morbidity were similar in the 2 groups. Mortality was 0. No mesh intolerance was reported. In the clinical follow-up (median: 29 months, range: 13-49), 11/27 (40.7%) hernias were recorded in the control group compared with 4/27 (14.8%) in the study group (P = 0.03). Abdominal computed tomography identified 14/27 (44.4%) hernias in the control group compared with 6/27 (22.2%) in the study group (P = 0.08).

Conclusions: Parastomal placement of a mesh reduces the appearance of PH. The technique is safe, well-tolerated, and does not increase morbidity rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Prevention of parastomal hernia. Is it possible?
    Ballas KD, Rafailidis SF, Symeonidis N, Sakadamis AK. Ballas KD, et al. Ann Surg. 2010 Feb;251(2):385; author reply 385-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cb8918. Ann Surg. 2010. PMID: 20010082 No abstract available.
  • Prevention of parastomal hernia. It is possible!
    Schreinemacher MH, Beets GL, Bouvy ND. Schreinemacher MH, et al. Ann Surg. 2010 Oct;252(4):707-8; author reply 708. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f47c15. Ann Surg. 2010. PMID: 20881781 No abstract available.

Publication types

MeSH terms