SWISSspine: a nationwide registry for health technology assessment of lumbar disc prostheses
- PMID: 19301042
- PMCID: PMC2899652
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-0934-8
SWISSspine: a nationwide registry for health technology assessment of lumbar disc prostheses
Erratum in
- Eur Spine J. 2009 Jun;18(6):862
Abstract
SWISSspine is a so-called pragmatic trial for assessment of safety and efficiency of total disc arthroplasty (TDA). It follows the new health technology assessment (HTA) principle of "coverage with evidence development". It is the first mandatory HTA registry of its kind in the history of Swiss orthopaedic surgery. Its goal is the generation of evidence for a decision by the Swiss federal office of health about reimbursement of the concerned technologies and treatments by the basic health insurance of Switzerland. During the time between March 2005 and 2008, 427 interventions with implantation of 497 lumbar total disc arthroplasties have been documented. Data was collected in a prospective, observational multicenter mode. The preliminary timeframe for the registry was 3 years and has already been extended. Data collection happens pre- and perioperatively, at the 3 months and 1-year follow-up and annually thereafter. Surgery, implant and follow-up case report forms are administered by spinal surgeons. Comorbidity questionnaires, NASS and EQ-5D forms are completed by the patients. Significant and clinically relevant reduction of low back pain VAS (70.3-29.4 points preop to 1-year postop, p < 0.0001) leg pain VAS (55.5-19.1 points preop to 1-year postop, p < 0.001), improvement of quality of life (EQ-5D, 0.32-0.73 points preop to 1-year postop, p < 0.001) and reduction of pain killer consumption was revealed at the 1-year follow-up. There were 14 (3.9%) complications and 7 (2.0%) revisions within the same hospitalization reported for monosegmental TDA; there were 6 (8.6%) complications and 8 (11.4%) revisions for bisegmental surgery. There were 35 patients (9.8%) with complications during followup in monosegmental and 9 (12.9%) in bisegmental surgery and 11 (3.1%) revisions with 1 [corrected] new hospitalization in monosegmental and 1 (1.4%) in bisegmental surgery. Regression analysis suggested a preoperative VAS "threshold value" of about 44 points for increased likelihood of a minimum clinically relevant back pain improvement. In a short-term perspective, lumbar TDA appears as a relatively safe and efficient procedure concerning pain reduction and improvement of quality of life. Nevertheless, no prediction about the long-term goals of TDA can be made yet. The SWISSspine registry proofs to be an excellent tool for collection of observational data in a nationwide framework whereby advantages and deficits of its design must be considered. It can act as a model for similar projects in other health-care domains.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Benchmarking in the SWISSspine registry: results of 52 Dynardi lumbar total disc replacements compared with the data pool of 431 other lumbar disc prostheses.Eur Spine J. 2010 Dec;19(12):2190-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1550-3. Epub 2010 Aug 15. Eur Spine J. 2010. PMID: 20711843 Free PMC article.
-
Five-year results of lumbar disc prostheses in the SWISSspine registry.Eur Spine J. 2014 Oct;23(10):2114-26. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3418-4. Epub 2014 Jun 20. Eur Spine J. 2014. PMID: 24947182
-
Hybrid construct for two levels disc disease in lumbar spine.Eur Spine J. 2010 Feb;19(2):290-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1182-7. Epub 2009 Nov 4. Eur Spine J. 2010. PMID: 19888610 Free PMC article.
-
Design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty.Eur Spine J. 2008 Dec;17(12):1635-50. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0811-x. Epub 2008 Oct 23. Eur Spine J. 2008. PMID: 18946684 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Microdiscectomy compared with standard discectomy: an old problem revisited with new outcome measures within the framework of a spine surgical registry.Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):360-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0917-9. Epub 2009 Mar 3. Eur Spine J. 2009. PMID: 19255791 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparative effectiveness research across two spine registries.Eur Spine J. 2012 Aug;21(8):1640-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2256-5. Epub 2012 Mar 14. Eur Spine J. 2012. PMID: 22415762 Free PMC article.
-
Superior outcomes of decompression with an interlaminar dynamic device versus decompression alone in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and back pain: a cross registry study.Eur Spine J. 2015 Oct;24(10):2228-35. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4124-6. Epub 2015 Jul 18. Eur Spine J. 2015. PMID: 26187621
-
Generic Preference-based Measures for Low Back Pain: Which of Them Should Be Used?Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Mar;41(6):E364-74. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001247. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016. PMID: 26583478 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of preoperative nucleus pulposus status and radiculopathy on outcomes in mono-segmental lumbar total disc replacement: results from a nationwide registry.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Dec 2;12:275. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-275. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011. PMID: 22136141 Free PMC article.
-
Editor's preface: the science of intervertebral disc replacement.Eur Spine J. 2012 Jun;21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S575-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2346-4. Epub 2012 May 8. Eur Spine J. 2012. PMID: 22565804 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Shah RV, Nanieva R, Pfeiffer F, Fenk-Mayer A, Kershaw T, Husted DS. The treatment of disabling single-level lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the prodisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Spine. 2005;30:2230–2236. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000182217.87660.40. - DOI - PubMed