Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2009 Jun;18(6):851-61.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0934-8. Epub 2009 Mar 20.

SWISSspine: a nationwide registry for health technology assessment of lumbar disc prostheses

Collaborators, Affiliations
Multicenter Study

SWISSspine: a nationwide registry for health technology assessment of lumbar disc prostheses

E Schluessmann et al. Eur Spine J. 2009 Jun.

Erratum in

  • Eur Spine J. 2009 Jun;18(6):862

Abstract

SWISSspine is a so-called pragmatic trial for assessment of safety and efficiency of total disc arthroplasty (TDA). It follows the new health technology assessment (HTA) principle of "coverage with evidence development". It is the first mandatory HTA registry of its kind in the history of Swiss orthopaedic surgery. Its goal is the generation of evidence for a decision by the Swiss federal office of health about reimbursement of the concerned technologies and treatments by the basic health insurance of Switzerland. During the time between March 2005 and 2008, 427 interventions with implantation of 497 lumbar total disc arthroplasties have been documented. Data was collected in a prospective, observational multicenter mode. The preliminary timeframe for the registry was 3 years and has already been extended. Data collection happens pre- and perioperatively, at the 3 months and 1-year follow-up and annually thereafter. Surgery, implant and follow-up case report forms are administered by spinal surgeons. Comorbidity questionnaires, NASS and EQ-5D forms are completed by the patients. Significant and clinically relevant reduction of low back pain VAS (70.3-29.4 points preop to 1-year postop, p < 0.0001) leg pain VAS (55.5-19.1 points preop to 1-year postop, p < 0.001), improvement of quality of life (EQ-5D, 0.32-0.73 points preop to 1-year postop, p < 0.001) and reduction of pain killer consumption was revealed at the 1-year follow-up. There were 14 (3.9%) complications and 7 (2.0%) revisions within the same hospitalization reported for monosegmental TDA; there were 6 (8.6%) complications and 8 (11.4%) revisions for bisegmental surgery. There were 35 patients (9.8%) with complications during followup in monosegmental and 9 (12.9%) in bisegmental surgery and 11 (3.1%) revisions with 1 [corrected] new hospitalization in monosegmental and 1 (1.4%) in bisegmental surgery. Regression analysis suggested a preoperative VAS "threshold value" of about 44 points for increased likelihood of a minimum clinically relevant back pain improvement. In a short-term perspective, lumbar TDA appears as a relatively safe and efficient procedure concerning pain reduction and improvement of quality of life. Nevertheless, no prediction about the long-term goals of TDA can be made yet. The SWISSspine registry proofs to be an excellent tool for collection of observational data in a nationwide framework whereby advantages and deficits of its design must be considered. It can act as a model for similar projects in other health-care domains.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preoperative comorbidities of the study sample
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Course of pre- to postoperative back pain alleviation over the first postoperative year. The linear regression shows the average pain over the postoperative time. The dotted lines are 95% confidence intervals
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Distribution of patients with back pain improvement/worsening
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Course of pre- to postoperative leg pain alleviation over the first postoperative year. The linear regression shows the average pain over the postoperative time. The dotted lines are 95% confidence intervals
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Distribution of patients with leg pain improvement/worsening
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Differences in pre- to postoperative QoL in non-depressed and depressed patients. The linear regression shows the average scores for both samples over the postoperative time. The dotted lines are 95% confidence intervals
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Threshold values for clinically relevant back pain relief of 18 points on VAS

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baur-Melnyk A, Birkenmaier C, Reiser MF. Lumbale Bandscheibenendoprothesen: Indikationen, Biomechanik, Typen und radiologische Kriterien. Radiologe. 2006;46:768–778. doi: 10.1007/s00117-006-1356-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Shah RV, Nanieva R, Pfeiffer F, Fenk-Mayer A, Kershaw T, Husted DS. The treatment of disabling single-level lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the prodisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Spine. 2005;30:2230–2236. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000182217.87660.40. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cochrane AL. Archie Cochrane in his own words. Selections arranged from his 1972 introduction to “Effectiveness and Efficiency: Random Reflections on the Health Services” 1972. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10:428–433. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90008-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kleuver M, Oner FC, Jacobs WC. Total disc replacement for chronic low back pain: background and a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2003;12:108–116. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deyo RA, Nachemson A, Mirza SK. Spinal-fusion surgery—the case for restraint. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:722–726. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb031771. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms