The risk management of third parties during construction in multifunctional urban locations
- PMID: 19302276
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01213.x
The risk management of third parties during construction in multifunctional urban locations
Abstract
Buildings above roads, railways, and existing buildings themselves are examples of multifunctional urban locations. The construction stage of those buildings is in general extremely complicated. Safety is one of the critical issues during the construction stage. Because the traffic on the infrastructure must continue during the construction of the building above the infrastructure, falling objects due to construction activities form a major hazard for third parties, i.e., people present on the infrastructure or beneath it, such as car drivers and passengers. This article outlines a systematic approach to conduct quantitative risk assessment (QRA) and risk management of falling elements for third parties during the construction stage of the building above the infrastructure in multifunctional urban locations. In order to set up a QRA model, quantifiable aspects influencing the risk for third parties were determined. Subsequently, the conditional probabilities of these aspects were estimated by historical data or engineering judgment. This was followed by integrating those conditional probabilities, now used as input parameters for the QRA, into a Bayesian network representing the relation and the conditional dependence between the quantified aspects. The outcome of the Bayesian network-the calculation of both the human and financial risk in quantitative terms-is compared with the risk acceptance criteria as far as possible. Furthermore, the effect of some safety measures were analyzed and optimized in relation with decision making. Finally, the possibility of integration of safety measures in the functional and structural building design above the infrastructure are explored.
Similar articles
-
The third spatial dimension risk approach for individual risk and group risk in multiple use of space.J Hazard Mater. 2005 Aug 31;123(1-3):35-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.04.024. J Hazard Mater. 2005. PMID: 15936142 Review.
-
AIHA position statement on the removal of asbestos-containing materials (ACM) from buildings.Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1991 Jun;52(6):A324-8. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1991. PMID: 1858662
-
Does concern-driven risk management provide a viable alternative to QRA?Risk Anal. 2007 Feb;27(1):27-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00857.x. Risk Anal. 2007. PMID: 17362398
-
Space use optimisation and sustainability-environmental assessment of space use concepts.J Environ Manage. 2004 Nov;73(2):81-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.06.002. J Environ Manage. 2004. PMID: 15380313
-
The use of generic failure frequencies in QRA: the quality and use of failure frequencies and how to bring them up-to-date.J Hazard Mater. 2006 Mar 31;130(3):265-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.013. Epub 2005 Aug 18. J Hazard Mater. 2006. PMID: 16111809 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical