Assessment of difficulty in third molar surgery--a systematic review
- PMID: 19304033
- DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.08.010
Assessment of difficulty in third molar surgery--a systematic review
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this review was to identify the most important variables that determine surgical difficulty of impacted third molar extractions by their consistent showing in previous studies.
Materials and methods: Electronic library search for current evidence in the world literature was conducted, and relevant articles were selected, scrutinized, and the findings were compared.
Results: Seven articles were most relevant, and the results of the comparison of the selected articles showed that demographic variable, age; operative variables: surgeon procedure type and number of teeth extracted; and ratiographic variable, depth angulation; and root morphology, are the most consistent determinants of difficulty.
Conclusion: Current evidence is in support of 3 categoreis of variables strongly associated with surgical diffulty of impacted third molars. The most important variables in each of these categories have been identified.
Similar articles
-
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of prophylactic removal of wisdom teeth.Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(15):1-55. Health Technol Assess. 2000. PMID: 10932022
-
The effect of demographic and radiographic variables on surgical difficulty of impacted mandibular third molar: A prospective observational study.Wiad Lek. 2025;78(7):1375-1380. doi: 10.36740/WLek/205603. Wiad Lek. 2025. PMID: 40847873
-
Interventions for treating asymptomatic impacted wisdom teeth in adolescents and adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD003879. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003879.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD003879. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003879.pub3. PMID: 15846686 Updated.
-
Prediction of extraction difficulty for impacted maxillary third molars with deep learning approach.J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Sep;125(4S):101817. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101817. Epub 2024 Mar 7. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024. PMID: 38458545
-
Evaluation of postoperative complications after mandibular third molar surgery with the use of platelet-rich fibrin: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Sep;46(9):1138-1146. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 May 1. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017. PMID: 28473242
Cited by
-
Correlation of panoramic radiographs and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of a superimposed relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars.Imaging Sci Dent. 2012 Sep;42(3):121-7. doi: 10.5624/isd.2012.42.3.121. Epub 2012 Sep 21. Imaging Sci Dent. 2012. PMID: 23071961 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Infection and Effective Factors in Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgeries: A Cross-Sectional Study.Int J Dent. 2022 May 4;2022:8934184. doi: 10.1155/2022/8934184. eCollection 2022. Int J Dent. 2022. PMID: 35572352 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical and Radiographic Characteristics as Predictive Factors of Swelling and Trismus after Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: A Longitudinal Approach.Pain Res Manag. 2018 Apr 23;2018:7938492. doi: 10.1155/2018/7938492. eCollection 2018. Pain Res Manag. 2018. PMID: 29849848 Free PMC article.
-
Cyanoacrylate versus suture as flap closure methods in mandibular third molar surgery: a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical study.Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2024 Jul 1;29(4):e458-e467. doi: 10.4317/medoral.26375. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2024. PMID: 38907642 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Which factors are associated with difficult surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars?J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Oct;42(5):251-258. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2016.42.5.251. Epub 2016 Oct 25. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016. PMID: 27847732 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources