Larval therapy for leg ulcers (VenUS II): randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 19304577
- PMCID: PMC2659858
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b773
Larval therapy for leg ulcers (VenUS II): randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: To compare the clinical effectiveness of larval therapy with a standard debridement technique (hydrogel) for sloughy or necrotic leg ulcers.
Design: Pragmatic, three armed randomised controlled trial.
Setting: Community nurse led services, hospital wards, and hospital outpatient leg ulcer clinics in urban and rural settings, United Kingdom.
Participants: 267 patients with at least one venous or mixed venous and arterial ulcer with at least 25% coverage of slough or necrotic tissue, and an ankle brachial pressure index of 0.6 or more.
Interventions: Loose larvae, bagged larvae, and hydrogel.
Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was time to healing of the largest eligible ulcer. Secondary outcomes were time to debridement, health related quality of life (SF-12), bacterial load, presence of meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, adverse events, and ulcer related pain (visual analogue scale, from 0 mm for no pain to 150 mm for worst pain imaginable).
Results: Time to healing was not significantly different between the loose or bagged larvae group and the hydrogel group (hazard ratio for healing using larvae v hydrogel 1.13, 95% confidence interval 0.76 to 1.68; P=0.54). Larval therapy significantly reduced the time to debridement (2.31, 1.65 to 3.2; P<0.001). Health related quality of life and change in bacterial load over time were not significantly different between the groups. 6.7% of participants had MRSA at baseline. No difference was found between larval therapy and hydrogel in their ability to eradicate MRSA by the end of the debridement phase (75% (9/12) v 50% (3/6); P=0.34), although this comparison was underpowered. Mean ulcer related pain scores were higher in either larvae group compared with hydrogel (mean difference in pain score: loose larvae v hydrogel 46.74 (95% confidence interval 32.44 to 61.04), P<0.001; bagged larvae v hydrogel 38.58 (23.46 to 53.70), P<0.001).
Conclusions: Larval therapy did not improve the rate of healing of sloughy or necrotic leg ulcers or reduce bacterial load compared with hydrogel but did significantly reduce the time to debridement and increase ulcer pain.
Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN55114812 and National Research Register N0484123692.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
Comment in
-
Larval therapy for leg ulcers. Wrong treatment.BMJ. 2009 May 27;338:b2063. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2063. BMJ. 2009. PMID: 19474008 No abstract available.
-
Larval therapy for leg ulcers. Compression may be key.BMJ. 2009 May 27;338:b2064. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2064. BMJ. 2009. PMID: 19474009 No abstract available.
References
-
- Nelzen O, Bergqvist D, Lindhagen A. Venous and non-venous leg ulcers: clinical history and appearance in a population study. Br J Surg 1994;81:182-7. - PubMed
-
- Cullum N, Nelson EA, Flemming K, Sheldon T. Systematic reviews of wound care management: (5) beds; (6) compression; (7) laser therapy, therapeutic ultrasound, electrotherapy and electromagnetic therapy. Health Technol Assess 2001;5:1-221. - PubMed
-
- Cullum N, Nelson EA, Fletcher AW, Sheldon TA. Compression for venous leg ulcers [update of Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;(3):CD000265]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;(2):CD000265. - PubMed
-
- Iglesias C, Nelson EA, Cullum NA, Torgerson DJ, Ven UST. VenUS I: a randomised controlled trial of two types of bandage for treating venous leg ulcers. Health Technol Assess 2004;8:iii. - PubMed
-
- Armstrong DG, Mossel J, Short B, Nixon BP, Knowles EA, Boulton AJM. Maggot debridement therapy: a primer. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2002;92:398-401. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical