A feature-weighting account of priming in conjunction search
- PMID: 19304616
- DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.2.258
A feature-weighting account of priming in conjunction search
Abstract
Previous research on the priming effect in conjunction search has shown that repeating the target and distractor features across displays speeds mean response times but does not improve search efficiency: Repetitions do not reduce the set size effect-that is, the effect of the number of distractor items-but only modulate the intercept of the search function. In the present study, we investigated whether priming modulates search efficiency when a conjunctively defined target randomly changes between red and green. The results from an eyetracking experiment show that repeating the target across trials reduced the set size effect and, thus, did enhance search efficiency. Moreover, the probability of selecting the target as the first item in the display was higher when the target-distractor displays were repeated across trials than when they changed. Finally, red distractors were selected more frequently than green distractors when the previous target had been red (and vice versa). Taken together, these results indicate that priming in conjunction search modulates processes concerned with guiding attention to the target, by assigning more attentional weight to features sharing the previous target's color.
Similar articles
-
Contextual cueing in multiconjunction visual search is dependent on color- and configuration-based intertrial contingencies.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Jun;36(3):515-32. doi: 10.1037/a0017448. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010. PMID: 20515186
-
Featural guidance in conjunction search: the contrast between orientation and color.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Oct;36(5):1108-27. doi: 10.1037/a0017179. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010. PMID: 20718568
-
Can intertrial effects of features and dimensions be explained by a single theory?J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Dec;34(6):1417-40. doi: 10.1037/a0011386. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008. PMID: 19045983
-
Association between cue lead time and template-for-rejection effect.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Aug;81(6):1880-1889. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01761-0. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019. PMID: 31114955 Review.
-
"I know what you did on the last trial"--a selective review of research on priming in visual search.Front Biosci. 2008 Jan 1;13:1171-81. doi: 10.2741/2753. Front Biosci. 2008. PMID: 17981621 Review.
Cited by
-
Same, but different: Binding effects in auditory, but not visual detection performance.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Feb;85(2):438-451. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02436-5. Epub 2022 Feb 2. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023. PMID: 35107812 Free PMC article.
-
On the role of top-down and bottom-up guidance in conjunction search: Singleton interference revisited.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Aug;85(6):1784-1810. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02691-8. Epub 2023 Apr 5. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023. PMID: 37017865 Free PMC article.
-
Responding, fast and slow: Visual detection and localization performance is unaffected by retrieval.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jan;86(1):171-185. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02810-5. Epub 2023 Nov 20. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024. PMID: 37985594 Free PMC article.
-
How does implicit learning of search regularities alter the manner in which you search?Psychol Res. 2015 Mar;79(2):183-93. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0546-8. Epub 2014 Feb 22. Psychol Res. 2015. PMID: 24558017
-
Eye movements reveal the contributions of early and late processes of enhancement and suppression to the guidance of visual search.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Aug;84(6):1913-1924. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02536-w. Epub 2022 Jul 20. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022. PMID: 35859034 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources