Auditory event files: integrating auditory perception and action planning
- PMID: 19304624
- DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.2.352
Auditory event files: integrating auditory perception and action planning
Abstract
The features of perceived objects are processed in distinct neural pathways, which call for mechanisms that integrate the distributed information into coherent representations (the binding problem). Recent studies of sequential effects have demonstrated feature binding not only in perception, but also across (visual) perception and action planning. We investigated whether comparable effects can be obtained in and across auditory perception and action. The results from two experiments revealed effects indicative of spontaneous integration of auditory features (pitch and loudness, pitch and location), as well as evidence for audio-manual stimulus-response integration. Even though integration takes place spontaneously, features related to task-relevant stimulus or response dimensions are more likely to be integrated. Moreover, integration seems to follow a temporal overlap principle, with features coded close in time being more likely to be bound together. Taken altogether, the findings are consistent with the idea of episodic event files integrating perception and action plans.
Similar articles
-
How object-specific are object files? Evidence for integration by location.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Oct;36(5):1184-92. doi: 10.1037/a0019955. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010. PMID: 20718565
-
How much attention does an event file need?J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Oct;31(5):1067-82. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.1067. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005. PMID: 16262499
-
Intermodal event files: integrating features across vision, audition, taction, and action.Psychol Res. 2009 Sep;73(5):674-84. doi: 10.1007/s00426-008-0163-5. Epub 2008 Oct 3. Psychol Res. 2009. PMID: 18836741 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Sensitivity and selectivity of neurons in auditory cortex to the pitch, timbre, and location of sounds.Neuroscientist. 2010 Aug;16(4):453-69. doi: 10.1177/1073858410371009. Epub 2010 Jun 7. Neuroscientist. 2010. PMID: 20530254 Review.
-
Feature integration across multimodal perception and action: a review.Multisens Res. 2013;26(1-2):143-57. doi: 10.1163/22134808-00002390. Multisens Res. 2013. PMID: 23713203 Review.
Cited by
-
The time-course of distractor processing in auditory spatial negative priming.Psychol Res. 2016 Sep;80(5):744-56. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0685-6. Epub 2015 Aug 2. Psychol Res. 2016. PMID: 26233234
-
Auditory distractor processing in sequential selection tasks.Psychol Res. 2014;78(3):411-22. doi: 10.1007/s00426-013-0527-3. Epub 2013 Nov 21. Psychol Res. 2014. PMID: 24258869 Review.
-
Binding of the feature stimulus duration in the auditory domain: S-R or S-S binding; or both?Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Aug;78(8):1691-1706. doi: 10.1177/17470218241287190. Epub 2024 Oct 23. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025. PMID: 39268581 Free PMC article.
-
Audiomotor integration of angry and happy prosodies.Psychol Res. 2019 Nov;83(8):1640-1655. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1020-9. Epub 2018 Apr 19. Psychol Res. 2019. PMID: 29675706
-
Improved motor sequence retention by motionless listening.Psychol Res. 2013 May;77(3):310-9. doi: 10.1007/s00426-012-0433-0. Epub 2012 Mar 21. Psychol Res. 2013. PMID: 22434336 Clinical Trial.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous